My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-12-08_INSPECTION - C1996083 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2011-12-08_INSPECTION - C1996083 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:45:56 PM
Creation date
4/10/2012 10:00:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
12/8/2011
Doc Name
Email sent to Operator attached with Inspection Report sent via Email (Coversheet)
From
DRMS
To
Bill Bear
Inspection Date
11/29/2011
Email Name
JJD
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 29, 2011 C -1996 -083 /Bowie No. 2 Mine JJD <br /> <br /> <br />Number of Partial I nspection this Fiscal Year: 4 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 2 <br /> <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />HYDROLOGIC BALANCE - Rule 4.05 Drainage Control 4.05.1, 4.05.2, 4.05.3; Siltation S tructures 4.05.5, <br />4.05.6; Discharge Structures 4.05.7, 4.05.10; Diversions 4.05.4; Effluent Limits 4.05.2; Ground Water <br />Monitoring 4.05.13; Surface Water Monitoring 4.05.13; Drainage – Acid and Toxic Materials 4.05.8; <br />Impoundments 4.05.6, 4.05.9; Stream Buffer Zones 4.05.18: <br /> The primary discharge pipe at pond B was not operational so the operator had set up a pump for pond <br />discharges until the problem could be fixed. There was only a small volume of standing water in pond B. The pond <br />embankment appeared to be stable and the open channel emergency spillway was clear of any debris. There was a <br />moderate volume of water in pond C and only a little water in pond D. The water level in pond F was near the <br />point of discharge and the operator was planning on disc harging the pond soon. Ponds J and K at the unit train <br />loadout area were dry. <br /> <br />Some of the straw bales at the pump house need to be replaced. Straw waddles still need to be placed in the road <br />ditch at the Hubbard Creek fan site area. There were no problems noted with any of the mine site ditches and <br />culverts. <br /> <br />PROCESSING WASTE/COAL MINE WASTE PILES – Rule 4.10 and 4.11 Drainage Control; Surface <br />Stabilization; Placement: <br /> The operator was finishing the outslope of the 2nd lift of gob material on the east s ide of coal waste pile <br />no. 2. The area just to the west of that area was being worked on in order to continue the reworking of the 2nd lift <br />outslope further westward. The outslope of the 1st lift was stable, with no indications of slope failure or erosiona l <br />gullying. No standing water was observed on the coal waste pile. No coal waste has been transported to gob pile <br />no. 3 yet. <br /> <br />ROADS – Rule 4.03 Construction 4.03.1(3)/4.03.2(3) Drainage 4.03.1(4)/4.03.2(4) Surfacing and <br />Maintenance4.03.1(5) and (6)/4.03 .2(5) and (6) Reclamation 4.03.1(7)/4.03.2(7): <br /> The main, paved haul road was in good condition, although the last curve at the top of the hill has not been <br />repaved yet. The guard rail was in place and the road ditches had sufficient capacity. The coal w aste pile haul road <br />was in good condition but the section within the coal waste pile area was watered during the inspection. The road’s <br />outside edge berm and road ditches were in place. The dirt entrance road at the unit train loadout was dry and <br />easily pa ssable. The public road up to the Hubbard Creek fan site was dry and passable as well. <br /> <br />RECLAMATION SUCCESS - Rule 4.15, Rule 3: <br /> The Hubbard Creek fan site area had been recently reclaimed. The backfilling and grading removed any <br />highwalls and the final grading left small depressions in the ground for moisture retention. The area had been <br />reseeded but the vegetation has not come up yet. Straw waddles still needed to be put in the road ditch to control <br />sediment coming off of the reclaimed area. <br /> <br />REVEGETAT ION – Rule 4.15 Vegetative Cover; Timing: <br /> The fill outslopes at the main mine site have a good vegetative cover, which has served to minimize <br />erosional problems. The outslopes of the unit train loadout and spur line bench have a good vegetative cover of <br />grasses. The revegetated disturbed area at the reclaimed Hubbard Creek fan site has not come up yet.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.