My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-03-28_INSPECTION - C1996083
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2012-03-28_INSPECTION - C1996083
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:55:33 PM
Creation date
4/9/2012 7:47:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
3/28/2012
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
William Bear
Inspection Date
3/28/2012
Email Name
BFB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
March 28, 2012 C- 1996 - 083 /Bowie No. 2 Mine BFB <br />free of debris. At the Terror Creek fan site, a berm was in place, the ground sloped toward the spillway and straw <br />bales and rocks were in place for the SAE (photo 4). <br />Pond B, C, D and F contained water, were not discharging and appeared to be functioning properly. Pond J was <br />dry and pond K contained water from a recent clean-out of the train load out conveyor belt tunnel. <br />Ditch D -1 on the east side of gob pile 2, was diverted to ditch D -F 15 which drains to Pond F. Upon further <br />review it has been determined that this change is not part of the Coal Mine Waste Disposal Area Drainage Plans <br />(Volume IX, Figure 2). Ditch D -F4 is designed to drain directly to Pond F and not to Ditch D -1 Ditch D -1 is <br />also not constructed to the designed specification outlined in Volume IX, page App -B 15 and Figure 3. It is <br />supposed to be a trapezoidal channel with a bottom width of 3.0 feet and side slopes of 1.5:1 (photo 5). <br />Continued review determined that Ditch D -F15 is also not constructed according to the Coal Mine Waste Disposal <br />Area Drainage Plans. According to the SEDCAD design (Volume IX, page App -1326) and Volume IX Figures 2 <br />and 3, ditch D -F15 is a trapezoidal riprap channel with a bottom width of 3.0 feet, side slopes of 1.5:1 and a 30% <br />slope from north of the coverfill stock pile to the southeast corner of the pile where ditch turns to the west. <br />Currently, Ditch D -F 15 is not riprapped and stops on the east side of the coverfill pile (photo 6). At this point, the <br />water is discharged at the top of a reclaimed hill where it has cut a small gully. The water then flows over an open <br />flat reclaimed hillside to the bottom of the hill (photo 7) where it reconnects with the west flowing segment of <br />Ditch D -F 15 to Pond F. <br />PROCESSING WASTE /COAL MINE WASTE PILES — Rule 4.10 and 4.11 <br />Drainage Control; Surface Stabilization; Placement: <br />In an aerial photo taken March 16, 2012, the coal mine waste (CMW) that was being stacked on gob pile <br />#4 was wet enough to flow down the south slope of the gob pile (photo 8). The gob flowed down the hillside, over <br />ditch D -D8 (and bench) and stopped at the lower gob pile access road. Bill Bear explained that weather conditions <br />have not been favorable for drying and compaction of the gob. Therefore, it was being stacked (piled) for drying <br />and with limited space, the stacked wet material flowed down hill. No material flowed beyond the extent of the <br />gob pile, no topsoil was lost, no access /haul roads were obstructed and there were no off -site impacts. <br />Cover fill material was being moved from the cover fill pile (east of gob pile #2 topsoil stockpile) to the cover fill <br />stockpile east of pond F to make additional room for gob material. During the inspection, gob material was <br />dumped, layered and compacted. <br />Bill Bear authorized the installation of new piezometers used in gob pile monitoring that were damaged beyond <br />repair. The locations of the damaged piezometers are shown in the Stover & Associates 4th Quarter 2011 Coal <br />Mine Waste Bank Inspection Report. <br />ROADS — Rule 4.03 Construction 4.03.1(3)/4.03.2(3) Drainage 4.03.1(4)/4.03.2(4) Surfacing and <br />Maintenance4.03.1(5) and (6)/4.03.2(5) and (6) Reclamation 4.03.1(7)/4.03.2(7): <br />The coal mine waste haul road was dry, well maintained, passable and roadside ditches were in place. The <br />Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 6 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 3 <br />Page 3 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.