My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-01-17_INSPECTION - C1981010 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2012-01-17_INSPECTION - C1981010 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:47:35 PM
Creation date
4/5/2012 10:54:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Date
1/17/2012
Doc Name
Email sent to Operator with Inspection Report sent via Email (Cover sheet)
From
DRMS
To
Graham - Trapper Mining, Inc
Inspection Date
1/12/2012
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January 12, 2012 C -1981 -010 /Trapper Mine JLE <br /> <br /> <br />Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 8 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 2 <br /> <br /> Page 3 of 7 <br /> <br />embankment appeared stable. <br /> <br />Johnson #7; the pond was holding water but was snow and ice covered. The sediment marker was in place but <br />was covered with snow and ice. The spillway was functioning properly. <br /> <br />Johnson #8; the embankment appeared stable and vegetated. The pond was holding water but was snow and ice <br />covered. The spillway appeared to be functioning property. <br /> <br />Johnson #9; the embankment appeared stable and vegetated. The sediment marker was in p lace. The pond was <br />holding water and the spillway appeared to be functioning. <br /> <br />Impoundment H; this pond was holding water and the spillway appeared to be functioning. The pond slopes were <br />stable and vegetated. <br /> <br />West Pyeatt #1; this pond was holding wa ter. The embankment appeared stable. <br /> <br />West Pyeatt #2; the spillway appeared to be functioning. The sediment marker was in place. The embankment <br />was stable. <br /> <br />Middle Pyeatt #3; this pond was dry. The sediment marker was in place. A badger hole was not ed in the <br />embankment. According to Mr. Roberts, this is a common issue for ponds that are consistently dry and are <br />repaired when needed. <br /> <br />Middle Pyeatt #2; this pond was dry. The spillway was in place and stable. The embankment was stable and <br />vegetate d. <br /> <br />Middle Pyeatt #1; this pond was holding water but was not discharging. The spillway and sediment markers were <br />in place. <br /> <br />East Pyeatt #1; this pond had been cleaned out last year. The embankment was stable and vegetated. <br /> <br />East Pyeatt #2; this pond was holding water. The embankment was stable and the spillway was in place and <br />functioning. The sediment marker appeared to be in place but was covered with snow and ice. <br /> <br />Middle Flume #1; this pond was snow covered. The embankment was stable and veget ated. The spillway and <br />flume were in place and appeared to be functioning properly. <br /> <br />East Middle Flume; TMI is no longer pumping water from East A pit into this pond. The pond is holding water <br />and the embankment is stable. The western pond slope has a small gully developing. The gully does not appear to <br />have changed since the last inspection and is not very large. However, this gully will need to be repaired. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.