Laserfiche WebLink
1882.5 - (0.9 * 754.8) <br />t - = 14.3 <br />4 733596.4 (0.81 * 284653.9) <br />30 + 30 <br />dfsat - a <br />SE,. + (0.9* SE <br />nbr- 1 n 1 <br />- ( ,J 733596.4 (0.81 *28465 .9) <br />30 + 30 <br />dfsat 156.4' + (0.9 * 97.4) <br />30 -1 30 -1 <br />Since critical t = 0.850 (one - tailed, alpha = 0.2, 46 df and t is greater than this critical value, the <br />hypothesis of no difference is rejected and revegetation success for herbaceous production Phase III is <br />demonstrated relative to the Mountain Brush Reference Area. <br />Sagebrush. A Two - sample t -test of Reverse Null Hypothesis with Satterthwaite's Adjustment of the <br />assertion that the 2011 BRB -1 allowable herbaceous production is indistinguishable from Sagebrush <br />Reference Area allowable herbaceous production is as follows: <br />Xb — 0.9X,. <br />t — <br />L Ir _ + (0.9 * Sref � <br />! <br />n br nTBf <br />1882.5 - (0.9 * 963 <br />- = 16.1 <br />ii 733596.4 (0.81 * 177336.7) <br />30 + 30 <br />SEa <br />df - a <br />( SEA. + (0.9* SErsf r <br />ri — 1 n,. f - 1 <br />= 45.6 or 46 <br />24 <br />