Laserfiche WebLink
Aspen. A two- sample t -test of the Reverse Null Hypothesis with Satterthwaite's Adjustment of the assertion <br />that the 2011 BRB -1 allowable herbaceous production is indistinguishable from Aspen Reference Area <br />allowable herbaceous production is as follows: <br />t c <br />x — 4.9X f <br />s + (0.9 : sTef <br />nbr n ref <br />— 1882.5 — (0.9 * 1391.8) = 17.2 <br />733596.4 (0.81 * 330131.1) <br />30 + 30 <br />SEl <br />dfsat = <br />SEA + (0.9* SErof ) ) <br />k n b 1 ?t <br />— ( +733596.4 (0.81 *330131.1)) a <br />�( 30 + 30 <br />df — I = 47.7 or 48 <br />( 156.4' + (0.9 * 104.9)' <br />30 -1 30 -1 <br />Since critical t = 0.850 (one - tailed, alpha = 0.2, 48 dfsat) and t is greater than this critical value, the <br />hypothesis of no difference is rejected and revegetation success for herbaceous production Phase III is <br />demonstrated relative to the Aspen Reference Area. <br />Mountain Brush. A Two - sample t -test of Reverse Null Hypothesis with Satterthwaite's Adjustment of the <br />assertion that the 2011 BRB -1 allowable herbaceous production is indistinguishable from Mountain Brush <br />Reference Area allowable herbaceous production is as follows: <br />tc xbr -0.9. re f <br />z <br />s2 + (0.9 * s ref r <br />nbr nre <br />23 <br />