Laserfiche WebLink
There were no changes to the opening introductory text in pages Exh. 7 -23 -1 through 7 <br />The changes to the remainder of Exhibit 7, Item 23, are briefly summarized below. Corresponding changes to the Table <br />of Contents were also made, but are not described in detail here. <br />Exh. 7, Item 23, Part A, "SEDCAD Modeling" <br />Specifically, a paragraph was added on p. Exh.7 -23A -2 to highlight that two small areas are not permitted for disturbance <br />at this time, but the runoff curve numbers in those two areas were left unchanged, that is conservatively assumed for <br />modeling purposes to still have a disturbed (higher) runoff curve number. <br />All references to the Lower Clean Water diversion were excised, and the Network Sketch 7 -23A was revised to show the <br />watershed network without that diversion. <br />The SEDCAD model results for the 2012 and 2017 time frames were re -done and re- submitted with the eastern <br />watersheds no longer diverted, but reporting to the sediment pond system. <br />Exh. 7, Item 23, Part B, "Little Collom (LCX -IN) Sump Design" was also revised to reflect that the absence of the clean <br />water diversion requires the incised sump to be operated at a slightly lower starting pool elevation, at least in the initial <br />(2012) time frame, to keep 10 year /24 hour storms from engaging the emergency spillway in the Little Collom Pond (LCX - <br />DS) immediately downstream. These changes also resulted in revisions to the peak inflows, outflows and maximum storm <br />surge elevation in the sump, which revisions were incorporated into the Exh. 7 -2313-2 tables in that section. <br />Exh. 7, Item 23, Part C, "Little Collom Pond (LCX -DS) Design" also had to be revised to reflect the absence of the <br />clean water diversion. All discussion of the LCW diversion was excised, and the watershed acreages discussed in the <br />text were revised to now include the no longer diverted 958 acres of the eastern watersheds. As in the case of the sump <br />described above, the changes in the runoff volumes, flow rates and peak pool elevations in the 2012 and 2017 time <br />frames resulted in changes in the two Exh 7 -23C -2 tables in that section. <br />There were no changes required to Exh. 7, Item 23, Part D "Sediment Control for Topsoil Stockpiles. <br />Exh. 7, Item 23, Part E "Temporary Channel Design" was changed, essentially excising any mention of the LCW <br />(Lower Clean Water) Diversion. Reference to that diversion in the trapezoidal channel summary table, Table 7 -23E -2 was <br />also excised. The SEDCAD model run was also excised. <br />No changes were required to Exh. 7, Item 23, Part F, "Geotechnical Analysis- Collom Sediment Ponds ". <br />A small change was made on page Exh. 7 -23G -1 in Exh. 7, Item 23, part G, "Roadside Impoundment" to point out that <br />the two small areas currently shown as not yet approved for disturbance would nevertheless be conservatively modeled <br />by using their higher disturbed runoff curve number, a similar to the parallel comment in Exh. 7, Item 23, Part A. No other <br />changes were required to Part G. <br />No changes were required to Exh. 7, Item 23, part H "Small Area Exemptions." <br />Hopefully this explanation helps in your review of the materials. Please feel free to contact me at any time should you <br />have any additional questions or concerns. <br />Thanks for your efforts <br />Kurt <br />Kurtis R. Blunt <br />Environmental Supervisor <br />Colowyo Coal Company LP <br />Rio Tinto <br />5731 State Highway 13 Meeker, Colorado 81641 <br />T: 970.824.1531 M: 970.326.8941 F: 970.824.1598 <br />kurtis.blunt(c_riotinto.com www.riotinto.com <br />