Laserfiche WebLink
C- 1481 -008 TR -60 10- Nov -2011 <br />PAR No. 2 Page 2 of 4 <br />b) Attachment 2.05.3(3) -14 (Pond 011 Design) has been deleted from the Attachments index. <br />Please continue to retain this attachment in the permit. Attachment 2.05.3(3) -14 has been <br />restored to the Index. Item resolved <br />c) Attachment 2.05.3(3) -15 (Pond Slope Stability Analyses) —Page 1 refers to a "Drawing 1" <br />depicting a cross- section of the typical pond. The Division does not have a copy of "Drawing <br />1" in its records. Please provide a copy of this drawing with the adequacy response. <br />With the response, a copy of Drawing I (Typical Sediment Pond Cross Section) was <br />provided, as requested. However, the Division has additional comments related to this <br />Attachment. <br />i) Drawing 1, as provided, is at a scale that is difficult to read. Please consider providing a <br />larger version of Drawing 1, perhaps using 11 "xl7" paper instead of letter -sized paper. <br />ii) The dimensions of the pond embankment, as depicted graphically on Drawing I and as <br />identified by X -Y coordinates in the Case Runs provided with the Attachment appear to <br />be at odds with those described in the text. Specifically, the last paragraph of section 3- <br />Strength Parameters Used in Slope Stability Analysis states that the pond slopes will be <br />2.5H.I V. In contrast, it appears that the slopes used in the stability analysis were <br />4H.I V. If the Division is correct in its understanding, then the factor of safety <br />determined for the pond embankments at the mine must he reevaluated. Please review <br />Attachment 2.05.3(3) -15 and revise as appropriate. <br />d) Pond 011 As -Built has been returned to Attachment 2.05.3(3) -20, as was approved with TR -56. <br />(No response is needed.) <br />e) Pond 013 As -Built has been returned to Attachment 2.05.3(3) -21, as was approved with TR -56. <br />(No response is needed.) <br />f) The Pond 015 Design is located in Attachment 2.05.3(3) -22. Please add "(PR -06)" to show the <br />revision under which it was approved, and revise the title to be simply, "Pond 015 Design ". <br />Item resolved. <br />g) Attachment 2.05.3(3) -23 is the Seismic Survey approved under MR -78. Please change the <br />revised date to December 2010. The cover letter provided with the adequacy response <br />indicates that revised page 2.05.3(3) -23 -1 was attached. This page does not appear to have <br />been included. Please submit the revised page. <br />h) Attachment 2.05.3(3) -24, Pond 015 As- Built, has been added to the index. Please change <br />"(MR -81)" to "(TR -60) ". Item resolved. <br />2. 2.05.3 (3) Maps Index <br />The Division appreciates the addition of this Maps index to Section 2.05.3(3). There are, however, <br />a number of maps from the permit that have not been included in the list provided (please see <br />August 15 PAR for the original list). <br />Please revise the index of Maps for Section 2.05.3(3) to include each of the items listed above. The <br />map index was revised as requested. Item resolved. <br />3. 2.05.3(3) Text <br />a) Page 2.05.3(3)-2, last paragraph —the rule referenced is incorrect —please change to 4.05.2(7). <br />Item resolved. <br />