Laserfiche WebLink
Jared Ebert <br />- 2- March 13, 2012 <br />HON - Attached are Figures 1 and 2 that provide some well completion data. <br />4. The applicant noted alluvial wells -4, 5, 6 &7 were destroyed in a local flood. In <br />accordance with Rule 4.07.3 these wells need to be properly abandoned. An <br />abandonment report must be sent to the Division within 60 days of sealing all wells. <br />Please provide the Division with a written status of each of the wells listed as <br />"Discontinue" on the submitted revised page 2.05 -35. <br />HON - Alluvial wells 4, 5, 6 and 7 were destroyed in a local flood. Monitoring of <br />alluvial well AW -3 was discontinued because it was always dry. <br />5. The first paragraph on the revised page 2.05 -35 section (iv) deleted the following <br />language from what was approved in TR -07; "The DMG approved the cessation of all <br />water monitoring during July 1999." This language should be re- inserted into the first <br />paragraph of the revised page. Without this language it would not be documented in the <br />permit that temporary cessation of water monitoring was approved. This would confuse <br />the reasoning behind re- initiation of the monitoring program. <br />HON - The language regarding the 1999 approval of the cessation of monitoring was <br />added to page 2.05 -35. <br />6. Since the Division is requesting Honeywood Coal Company modify the monitoring <br />schedule and parameters, the original un- revised monitoring plan should be included in <br />the permit text so it is clear what monitoring stations, schedule and parameters were <br />monitored from 1995 to 1998. The wording/title of this information should make it clear <br />that it is for historical documentation only. <br />HON - A second column was added to page 2.05 -35. One column shows the 1995 to <br />1998 monitoring schedule and second column lists the 2012 monitoring schedule. <br />Sincerely, <br />( <br />J. E. toyer, P.E. <br />Consulting Engineer <br />