My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (85)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (85)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:49:13 PM
Creation date
3/15/2012 3:34:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/28/2012
Doc Name
VOL 7, Part 4: Cyanide Mgmt Code Recertification Audit
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM10
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
was requested to assess the potential for HCN generation within the impoundment, and if <br />significant, to provide separate containment for either the wash vessel or mix tank. <br />Therefore, following the onsite portion of the recertification audit, CC &V performed an <br />assessment to determine the potential for HCN generation within the impoundment in a <br />scenario in which the vessel and tank failed simultaneously. Based on the secondary <br />containment volume, the amount and moisture content of saturated carbon within the acid <br />wash vessel and its cyanide concentration, CC &V determined that approximately 1.67 <br />ppm of HCN gas would be generated in such an event. The alarm set point for the HCN <br />detection system within the ADR facility is 4.7 ppm; therefore, a concentration of 1.67 <br />ppm would not cause the system to alarm. Based its assessment, CC &V concluded that <br />HCN generation would not be significant and that separate secondary containment is <br />unwarranted. CC &V provided the audit team a copy of its assessment, including the <br />analytical test results and supporting calculations. <br />Pipelines are located above ground with the exception of the short segment of drainpipe <br />running from the ADR Plant overflow sump to the VLF. However, this pipe is located <br />above the geomembrane underliner system, which drains to the VLF. Additional <br />containment measures include differential flow /pressure and interlock systems. Based on <br />direct field observations and interviews with CC &V personnel, the risk to local surface <br />water quality from an unplanned pipeline rupture is extremely low. <br />CC &V uses carbon steel, stainless steel, HDPE, and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) piping <br />materials and piping system components. All cyanide process tanks are constructed of <br />carbon steel. These materials are compatible with cyanide and high pH solutions. <br />4.8 Implement quality control/quality assurance procedures to confirm that <br />cyanide facilities are constructed according to accepted engineering <br />standards and specifications. <br />The operation is: <br />• in full compliance <br />❑ in substantial compliance <br />❑ not in compliance...with Standard of Practice 4.8. <br />Describe the basis for the Finding/Deficiencies Identified: <br />Subsequent to the June 2007 certification audit, CC &V has constructed /implemented <br />several new cyanide facilities and made several modifications to existing cyanide <br />facilities at the Cresson Project. These include: <br />• Construction of the Phase IVc isolation barrier; <br />• Commissioning and decommissioning of a temporary carbon train at the ADR <br />Plant; <br />Cresson Project <br />Name of Mine <br />September 22, 2010 <br />Signature of Lead Auditor Date <br />Page 19 of 36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.