My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (95)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2012-02-28_REVISION - M1980244 (95)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:49:13 PM
Creation date
3/9/2012 12:17:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/28/2012
Doc Name
VOL. 2, Appendix 2: Hydrologic Evaluation Part 1
From
CRIPPLE CREEK & VICTOR GOLD MINING COMPANY
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM10
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(median values <0.01 mg/L) and relatively stable (with occasional spikes), for the <br />individual stations C -01 to CC -02 to CC -03 to CC -04 since 1985, 1996, 1996, and 1994, <br />respectively. Manganese concentrations have been elevated and show seasonal spikes <br />(mostly in 2 quarter) in concentrations for C -01, CC -02, and CC -03 since 1985, 1996, <br />and 1996, respectively. Manganese concentrations have been slightly elevated and show <br />seasonal spikes (mostly in 2 and 3 quarters) for CC -04 since 1994. Other trace metals <br />are analyzed as part of the monitoring program. Median values for arsenic, cadmium, <br />chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, and silver in the ground waters at CC -01, CC -02, <br />CC -03, and CC -04 were less than the analytical detection limits Median concentrations <br />of copper at all four locations and nickel at CC -02 were above the analytical detection <br />limits, but low. Trace metal data also are provided in Tables 5 -18, 5 -19, 5 -20, and 5 -21. <br />5.5.3.4 MLE2 Impacts to Surface Waters <br />No significant impacts are anticipated to the surface water resources in the main Cripple <br />Creek drainage at CC -01 due to MLE2. The construction of the SGVLF in Squaw Gulch <br />and the continued operation of the AGVLF in Arequa Gulch may slightly reduce <br />tributary flows from Squaw Gulch and Arequa Gulch to the surface flows in Cripple <br />Creek. The impacts of these reduced flows would be noted at CC -02 (Squaw Gulch), <br />CC -03 (Squaw Gulch and Arequa Gulch), and CC -04 (Squaw Gulch and Arequa Gulch). <br />Water quality conditions in Cripple Creek are expected to remain consistent with the <br />historic measurements. <br />The flow and water quality conditions in the surface waters of Cripple Creek will <br />continue to be monitored by CC -01, CC -02, CC -03, and CC -04. <br />5.5.4 Groundwater <br />5.5.4.1 Monitoring Program <br />There are no ground water monitor wells in the main Cripple Creek drainage. There are <br />monitor wells are located in the tributaries to Cripple Creek (Squaw Gulch, Poverty <br />Gulch, and Arequa Gulch). The data from these monitor wells are addressed in the <br />sections for those drainages. <br />5.5.4.2 Data <br />There are no ground water monitor wells in the main Cripple Creek drainage. <br />5.5.4.3 Discussion <br />There are no ground water monitor wells in the main Cripple Creek drainage. <br />'Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company <br />Cresson Project Hydrologic Evaluation for Mine Life Extension 2 <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.