Laserfiche WebLink
McClave Canyon Mine Expansion and Fruita Loadout Facility Biological Assessment <br />Management goals include (FWS, 2002b): <br />• Reestablish populations with hatchery- produced fish. <br />• Identify and maintain genetic variability in Lake Mohave. <br />• Provide and legally protect habitat necessary to provide adequate habitat and sufficient <br />range for all life stages. <br />• Provide passages over barriers within occupied habitat. <br />• investigate options for providing appropriate water temperatures in the Gunnison River. <br />• Minimize subadult and adult entrainment at diversion /out -take structures. <br />• Ensure protection from overutilization. <br />• Ensure protection from diseases and parasites. <br />• Regulate non - native fish releases and escapement. <br />• Control problematic non - native fish. <br />• Minimize the risk of hazardous materials spills in critical habitat. <br />• Remediate water quality problems. <br />• Minimize the threat'of hybridization with white sucker. <br />• Provide for the long -term management and protection 'of populations and their habitats. <br />Critical habitat. FWS (1994) designated the same critical habitat for razorback suckers as for <br />Colorado pikeminnows, described above. <br />4.3.2.2 Environmental Baseline <br />Current Status in the Action Area. Larval razorback suckers have been collected in.the <br />Colorado River upstream and downstream from' 'the confluence of Reed Wash (from River Mile <br />148.0 to River Mile 156.8) between -2004'and 2007 (see Table 7 in Osmundson and Seal, <br />2009). Most razorback suckers in the Colorado River have occurred in the Grand Valley near <br />Grand Junction, although the number fish captured in Grand Valley declined dramatically since <br />1974 (Osmundson and Kaeding, 1991). Wild fish may have been extirpated in the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin but hatchery fish have been stocked as a means to achieve recovery <br />goals. Since 1996, about 197,100 subadult razorback suckers have been stocked in the Upper <br />Colorado River system, (Felker et al., 2011). Survival of stocked razorback suckers was <br />dependerit 'ori their size when released; survival rates were much lower during the first year than <br />were assumed in the species' stocking plan (Zelasko 'et al.,, 2009). Except for a population <br />estimate of around 100 razorback suckers in the middle Green River (Modde et al., 1996), there <br />are no current estimates of razorback suckers in the upper Colorado River. <br />4.3.2.3 Effects by the Proposed Action <br />Direct and Indirect Effects. Construction and operation of the Proposed Action could directly <br />and /or indirectly affect razorback suckers through one or more of the same six pathways that <br />were described above for Colorado pikeminnows. <br />Selenium affects razorback suckers .similarly to other fish, including Colorado pikeminnows. <br />Selenium concentrations -in eggs and larvae exceed concentrations found in breeding adults <br />(Hamilton et al., 2002; Hamilton et al .., 2005x; Hamilton et al., 2005b). High levels of selenium <br />in eggs produce deformed embryos. In general, the percent of eggs that hatched.and the size <br />of eggs decreased with increasing selenium concentrations in adults, and levels of deformities <br />in embryos increased with increased selenium in adults (Hamilton et- al., 2005c). Selenium <br />contamination in the Colorado River is a major .concern in the species' recovery because the <br />species' reproduction is adversely affected. -As discussed for Colorado pikeminnows, any <br />increase of selenium into East Salt Creek or Reed Wash due to the Proposed Action would <br />impact razorback suckers recovery in the upper Colorado River system (Hamilton, 1998). <br />30 <br />