My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-03-07_PERMIT FILE - C2010088 (19)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2010088
>
2012-03-07_PERMIT FILE - C2010088 (19)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:54:49 PM
Creation date
3/8/2012 12:57:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010088
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/7/2012
Doc Name
Wildlife Report
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 10
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
tributaries and main -stem reaches of the Colorado River in the Grand Valley region of western <br />Colorado are an ongoing concern to local, State, and Federal agencies, local water providers, and <br />landowners (Leib 2008). This concern stems from a need to address regulatory water - quality <br />issues and impairment of native fish habitat. The project is not expected to increase the selenium <br />content of water entering Reed Wash and the Colorado River. <br />The rail spur will enter and exit the land farm on the east side of Reed Wash (Figure 1). The <br />land farm is protected by a berm approximately 4 -8 ft high, which surrounds the site. The berm <br />will remain intact during rail line construction and after project completion. The water retention <br />qualities of the land farm berm containment system will not be compromised. <br />The railroad bridge across Reed Wash will be constructed in a manner that it will span the <br />aquatic habitat. Therefore, no structures will be placed in the water to affect the current fish <br />access to upper Reed Wash. Rail spur bridge supports will likely be constructed in the 100 -year <br />floodplain on lands outside the channel of the wash. The size and structure of the bridge <br />supports are not likely to be large enough to impede fish movements in the event of flood stage <br />conditions. <br />5.0 MITIGATION <br />5.1 MAMMALS <br />5.1.1 Mule Deer <br />Mule deer will continue to occupy the habitat in the project area but use is expected to remain at <br />the low densities of existing populations. Mitigation will be implemented to protect existing, <br />unaffected available habitat and avoid preventable operations activities that may influence <br />habitat use by this species. The following on -site mitigation measures are recommended for <br />implementation. <br />• Habitat Protection: Maintain protective cover and forage adjacent to project features <br />where mule deer may forage and seek cover in the project area. The Reed Wash riparian <br />corridor is the primary habitat for mule deer and will remain essentially unchanged due to <br />project development. <br />• Maintain a consistent annual noxious and invasive weed management program to <br />increase forage available to deer. <br />• Preserve the upland greasewood habitat during project construction; avoid unnecessary <br />habitat disturbance. <br />• Ensure that any fencing is constructed according to CDOW fence construction guidelines. <br />5.1.2 Predatory Mammals <br />5.1.2.1 River Otter: Otter habitat can be maintained by preserving or enhancing the existing <br />vegetation along Reed Wash. While tamarisk is not a preferred shrub species for wildlife, it does <br />provide thick cover and potential den sites for otter. Dense cover would help mitigate <br />disturbance once the loadout facility is operational. The riparian habitat would benefit by <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.