My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-02-28_PERMIT FILE - C1991078A (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1991078A
>
2011-02-28_PERMIT FILE - C1991078A (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:31:15 PM
Creation date
1/13/2012 11:06:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1991078A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/28/2011
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05 Operation and Reclamation Plan
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.05.4(2)Icl <br />The Stripping Ratio Contour Map, Drawing No. 105, <br />can be used to determine if the mine area should be categorized <br />as having thin or thick overburden. The bulking factor for the <br />overburden and spoil is estimated to be 1.3. The following table <br />lists by stripping ratio the projected ratio of the final volume <br />to the initial volume. Initial volume is the sum of overburden <br />and coal volume prior to removal of coal. Final volume is the <br />product of the overburden volume times the bulking factor minus <br />the volume of the coal. <br />Stripping Ratio <br />1:1 <br />1.6:1 <br />2:1 <br />3:1 <br />3.3:1 <br />4:1 <br />5:1 <br />6:1 <br />7:1 <br />8:1 <br />12:1 <br />0.65 <br />0.80 <br />0.87 <br />0.98 <br />1.00 <br />1.04 <br />1.08 <br />1.11 <br />1.14 <br />1.16 <br />1.20 <br />• It can be seen that the only areas of thin over- <br />burden are in the areas along the outcrop. The maximum stripping <br />ratio in the mine area is 8:1 so there are no areas of the mine <br />that would be classified as thick overburden. <br />The final contours of the mining area are influ- <br />enced b,y the thickness of the coal seam, the overburden and the <br />bulking factor. The table presented in Exhibit 12 lists the <br />estimated change in the original surface elevation based on these <br />factors. The extremes occur when the coal is the maximum thick- <br />ness, 6.0'. The table shows that the final contours may be 4'. <br />higher than the original contours in areas where the coal is 6. <br />thick and the stripping ratio is 8:1. The other extreme is where <br />the coal is 6.0' thick and the str p.~ng ratio is 1:1. In these <br />areas the final contours may be 4.2 ower than the original{,JOB <br />contours. a <br />_ _ ~esL+W~~~M"P" <br />The table presented in Exhibit 12 is the bas~is`~~for <br />the nrenaration of the final contour man. Final eradin¢ will be <br />done so the final topographic conT"igura <br />nearly the same as the postmining topogr <br />has been completed and the spoil tested <br />in accordance with Section 2.05.3(6), the <br />able for topsoil placement. <br />Ratio <br />Final Volume/Initial Volume <br />chic configuration shown <br />0. After final grading <br />for subsoil suitability <br />regraded area is avail- <br /> <br />. 2.05-22 May 1991 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.