2011-01-26_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010089

Home Browse Search

description (measurements or landmarks) of this excluded area to ensure consistency of future measurements. 7. Vegetation Success, Big Sagebrush, page 31 — The last sentence of the second paragraph states "Based upon this comparison, WFC feels justified in proposing to use the existing Dryland Pasture Reference Area as a success standard for the Dryland Pasture predisturbance area since it is already the approved revegetation success standard of the Big Sagebrush vegetation type at the NI-12 Mine." The Division believes the sentence should be, `Based upon this comparison, WFC feels justifies in proposing to use the existing Dryland Pasture Reference area as a success standard for the Big Sagebrush Pasture predisturbance area since it is already the approved revegetation success standard of the Big Sagebrush vegetation type at the NI-12 Mine." If this is correct, please make appropriate changes to the text. Does the Division need to address this proposal at this time? 8. Vegetation Success, Dryland Pasture, page 32 — The last sentence of the third paragraph states "Based upon this comparison, WFC feels justified in proposing to use the existing Dryland Pasture Reference Area as a success standard for the Dryland Pasture predisturbance area." The division feels that the sentence should say "Based on this comparison, WFC feels justified in proposing to use the existing Dryland Pasture Reference Area as a success standard for the Dryland Pasture predisturbance area in the NHN area since it is already the approved revegetation success standard of the Dryland Pasture predisturbance area at the NI-12 Mine." Does the Division need to address this proposal at this time? 9. Section 2.05.4(2)(e), page 10 — Attachments 2.05.4(2)(e) -1 Irrigation Design and Application Rates and 2.05.4(2)(e) -2 are not in the PAP. Please submit a copy of each of these charts to the Division. 2