Laserfiche WebLink
ADZ Laboratories, Inc. <br />2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334 -5493 <br />Golder Associates <br />ACZ ID WORKNUM PARAMETER <br />METHOD <br />QUAL DESCRIPTION <br />L90215 -04 WG309328 Chlonde <br />REPAD.15.06.05.01 <br />WG308864 Fluonde <br />WG308691 Nitrate /Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />WG309328 Sulfate <br />L90215 -05 WG309328 Chlonde <br />WG308864 Fluoride <br />WG308691 Nitrate /Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />L90215 -06 WG309328 Chlonde <br />WG308864 Fluonde <br />WG308691 Nitrate /Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />WG308750 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />SM4500F -C <br />M353 2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M353 2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M300.0 - Ion Chromatography <br />SM4500F -C <br />M353 2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M353 2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />SM4500F -C <br />M353.2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M353.2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />SM2540C <br />WG309328 Sulfate M300.0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />Inorganic Extended <br />Qualifier Report <br />ACZ Project ID: L90215 <br />DH Sample required dilution due to high TDS and /or EC value <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />DH Sample required dilution due to high TDS and /or EC value <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />01 Sample required dilution due to matrix <br />DH Sample required dilution due to high TDS and /or EC value. <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />ZO Concentration is based on a final residue greater than 200 <br />mg. <br />01 Sample required dilution due to matrix. <br />DH Sample required dilution due to high TDS and /or EC value. <br />Page 22 of 35 <br />