Laserfiche WebLink
ACZ Laboratories, Inc. <br />2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800) 334 -5493 <br />Golder Associates <br />ACZ ID WORKNUM PARAMETER <br />METHOD <br />QUAL DESCRIPTION <br />L90215 -01 WG309328 Chloride <br />WG308864 Fluonde <br />WG308691 Nitrate /Nitrite as N, dissolved M353 2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />Nitrite as N, dissolved M353 2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />WG308750 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C SM2540C <br />WG309328 Sulfate <br />L90215 -02 WG309328 Chloride <br />WG309328 Sulfate <br />L90215 -03 WG309328 Chlonde <br />REPAD.15.06.05.01 <br />WG308864 Fluonde <br />WG308691 Nitrate /Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />WG308750 Residue, Filterable (TDS) @180C <br />WG308864 Fluonde <br />WG308691 Nitrate /Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />Nitrite as N, dissolved <br />WG309328 Sulfate <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M300.0 - Ion Chromatography <br />SM4500F -C <br />M300 0 - on Chromatography <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M300.0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />SM4500F -C <br />M353.2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M353 2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />SM2540C <br />M300.0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M300.0 - Ion Chromatography <br />SM4500F -C <br />M353 2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M353.2 - Automated Cadmium <br />Reduction <br />M300.0 - Ion Chromatography <br />Inorganic Extended <br />Qualifier Report <br />ACZ Project ID: L90215 <br />O 1 Sample required dilution due to matrix <br />DH Sample required dilution due to high TDS and /or EC value <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />RA Relative Percent Drfference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL). <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />ZO Concentration is based on a final residue greater than 200 <br />mg. <br />O 1 Sample required dilution due to matrix <br />DH Sample required dilution due to high TDS and /or EC value <br />D1 Sample required dilution due to matrix <br />DF Sample required dilution due to high sediment. <br />DH Sample required dilution due to high TDS and /or EC value <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />ZO Concentration is based on a final residue greater than 200 <br />mg <br />O 1 Sample required dilution due to matrix <br />DF Sample required dilution due to high sediment <br />DH Sample required dilution due to high TDS and /or EC value <br />DH Sample required dilution due to high TDS and /or EC value <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the sample concentration is too low for <br />accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />• DH Sample required dilution due to high TDS and /or EC value <br />Page 21 of 35 <br />