Laserfiche WebLink
Scenario Description <br />Max. Q <br />Normal Storm <br />(no tailwater) <br />2 -Year (with <br />tailwater) <br />10- Year <br />(with <br />tailwater) <br />50- Year <br />(with <br />tailwater) <br />100- Year <br />(with <br />tailwater) <br />Input and Results from North American Green <br />ECMDS Version 4.3 <br />Inlet Discharge (cfs) <br />300 <br />2,630 <br />6,759 <br />19,235 <br />27,455 <br />Bottom Width (ft) <br />300 <br />300 <br />300 <br />300 <br />300 <br />Side Slopes (H:1V) <br />3 <br />3 <br />3 <br />3 <br />3 <br />Slope (ft/ft) <br />0.2 <br />0.00038* <br />0.00038* <br />0.00068* <br />0.00088* <br />Velocity (ft /s) <br />4.3 <br />3.7 <br />5.3 <br />9.7 <br />12.0 <br />Area (ft <br />70 <br />714 <br />1276 <br />1974 <br />2310 <br />Hydraulic Radius (ft) <br />0.2 <br />2.3 <br />3.9 <br />5.8 <br />6.7 <br />Depth (ft) <br />0.2 <br />2.3 <br />4.1 <br />6.2 <br />7.2 <br />Mat Type <br />P550 <br />P550 <br />P550 <br />P550 <br />P550 <br />Vegetation (Un /Partial /Fully) <br />Unvegetated <br />Unvegetated <br />Unvegetated <br />Unvegetated <br />Unvegetated <br />Permissible Shear Stress (Ib /ft <br />3.3 <br />3.3 <br />3.3 <br />3.3 <br />3.3 <br />Calculated Shear Stress (Ib /ft2) <br />1.4 <br />0.1 <br />0.1 <br />0.3 <br />0.4 <br />Safety Factor <br />(Permissible /Calculated) <br />2.3 <br />64.0 <br />36.0 <br />12.4 <br />8.2 <br />Remarks <br />Stable <br />Stable <br />Stable <br />Stable <br />Stable <br />HEC -RAS Model Spillway <br />Hydraulics <br />Velocity (ft/s) <br />3.2 <br />3.8 <br />5.4 <br />9.3 <br />12.0 <br />Area (ft <br />95 <br />697 <br />1258 <br />2228 <br />2737 <br />Hydraulic Radius (ft) <br />0.3 <br />2.2 <br />3.8 <br />5.2 <br />5.9 <br />Depth (ft) <br />0.3 <br />2.3 <br />4.0 <br />6.2 <br />6.9 <br />Shear Stress (Ib /ft <br />0.5 <br />0.4 <br />0.6 <br />1.8 <br />2.8 <br />Safety Factor <br />(Permissible /HEC -RAS Shear) <br />6.4 <br />8.6 <br />5.1 <br />1.9 <br />1.2 <br />Analysis of the Berm A inlet with NAG's P550 TRM was conducted for several hydraulic <br />conditions using North American Green's Erosion Control Materials Design Software Version 4.3. The <br />analysis was run for five different scenarios including a range of discharges and tailwater conditions. <br />Analysis results are provided in Appendix E.1. All analyses were run assuming that the P550 mat is in an <br />unvegetated condition. As TRMs become vegetated their stability increases. Therefore, running the <br />unvegetated analysis is a conservative assumption reflective of conditions for a period of time following <br />construction. However, the establishment of a healthy stand of vegetation is crucial to the long term <br />performance of the TRM. Table 4.1 provides the inputs and results of the TRM analysis. Also included in <br />the table are hydraulic calculations provided by the HEC -RAS hydraulic model in order to compare with <br />the ECMDS results. In all scenarios, an unvegetated P550 mat was found to be stable with safety factors <br />calculated by the ECMDS and manually using HEC -RAS results ranging from 1.6 to 96 and 1.4 to 11.6, <br />respectively. As the mat becomes vegetated, the safety factors will increase. <br />Table 4.1 Results of Hydraulic Analysis of Berm A Inlet with NAG P550 TRM <br />* Slope entered into NAG program to give similar hydraulic conditions computed by HEC -RAS model <br />COVALCOO1_Phase 11 Report_082211.docx <br />4.3 ANdERSON CONSU(TINq ENGiNEERS, INC. <br />