Laserfiche WebLink
3 C1981 -010; SL13 <br />December 1, 2011 <br />of relative cover of the principle species was 25.2 %; for 2011 it was 28.59 %. For both years no four <br />species in combination exceeded 80% relative cover. Based on this data, the species diversity standard <br />has been met. <br />Herbaceous Production <br />The harvest method was used to measure herbaceous production. Thirty randomly placed transects <br />were measured throughout the bond release block. It appears the same transects used to measure plant <br />cover were used to measure herbaceous production along with the addition of ten other transects. <br />Perennial grasses and perennial forbs were clipped in three randomly selected one - quarter square meter <br />plots per transect sampled. Annuals, biennials, noxious weeds and shrub production were not clipped. <br />The harvested plant material was then oven dried and weighed. The sampling method used meets the <br />criteria outlined in Rule 4.15.11(1) and the permit application. The 2010 and 2011 measurements <br />indicated that an average of 226.5 and 380.4 grams per square meter are produced at this site <br />respectively. The standard approved for the range site A is 62.39 grams per square meter. After <br />calculating sample adequacy as cited in Rule 4.15.11(2)(a), the required number of transects to <br />characterize this site at the 90% confidence interval exceeded the number of samples taken in 2010 and <br />2011. Given this, a "reverse" null hypothesis test was used to demonstrate reclamation success for <br />production in accordance with Rule 4.15.11(2)(c). Based on this calculation, the sample was adequate <br />and the success standard was met. <br />Woody Plant Density <br />A- modified -belt transect method was used to- measure - woody - plant - density -The -same30- randomly <br />- - -- <br />located transects used to measure production were used to measure woody plant density. One -meter <br />wide belts were measured on each side of a 50 meter tape per transect sampled. The 2010 and 2011 <br />measurements indicate on average 1,325 and 1,471 stems per acre, respectively, exist throughout the <br />bond release block. The approved permit standard is 400 stems per acre. After calculating sample <br />adequacy as cited in Rule•4.15.11(2)(a), the required number of transects to characterize this site at the <br />90% confidence interval exceeded the number of samples taken in 2010 and 2011. Given this, a <br />"reverse" null hypothesis test was used to determine reclamation success for woody plant density in <br />accordance with Rule 4.15.11(2)(c). Based on this calculation, the sample was adequate and the <br />success standard was met. <br />An additional component of the woody plant density standard for the Trapper Mine is comprised of <br />concentrated shrub clumps to be established on range A and B sites. These shrub clumps are <br />approximately 1.6 acres in size and are no more than 1,400 feet apart. Each clump is comprised of <br />250 transplanted mature shrub pads. A pad is considered a single front - end - loader bucket load of <br />native shrub stems. Three shrub clumps were included in the lands requested for bond release in SL13: <br />SC -A -01, SC -A -00 and SC -F -06. The shrub clumps are composed of transplanted shrub pads. If pads <br />exhibit 10 or more live stems per pad, the pad is considered alive. If 50% or more of the shrub pads <br />within a clump are considered alive, the clump is considered successful. The 2010 sample data found <br />83 % live pads within the clumps, while the 2011 sample data recorded approximately 66% live pads <br />within the clump. I conducted a sample adequacy calculation as described in Rule 4.15.11(2)(a) on the <br />2010 and 2011 data submitted for shrub clump survival. For the 2010 data, the sample number was <br />found to be adequate, and the success standard was met. The sample number was not found to be <br />adequate for the 2011 data. Given this, a "reverse" null hypothesis test was run for the 2011 data, and <br />based on this calculation the sample number taken were adequate and the standard was met. <br />