Laserfiche WebLink
27.00. It seems that the correct direction for the Navajo would be west, rather than east of <br />the county road. Please review, and revise if appropriate. <br />Response — The reference to the Navajo Mine being located to the east of CR 27.00 is <br />in error and the text will be changed to read "west" of 27.00 roam <br />19. In the last paragraph on Page 12 of Section 2.04.3, the term GL -REC is used; as discussed in <br />previous items, the term PL -REC is likely intended. Please review and revise as <br />appropriate. <br />Response — See the previous response to Item # 14. <br />2.04.5- General Description Geology and Hydrology <br />Map 2.04.5 -1 was revised to show monitoring station SW -NI in response to an email <br />from Joe Dudash to Ryan Lunde on November 1, 2011. <br />2.04.6 — Geology Description <br />2.04.6(2) — Surface Mining <br />7. DRMS: WFC submitted entirely new overburden sample data for the NHN permit area. The <br />new data is acceptable and closely followed our guidelines for the collection of overburden <br />geochemistry data. The laboratory analytical methods as presented in Appendix Table 2.04.6 -3 <br />data sheets are also consistent with our guidelines. The Division requests the following <br />clarifications. On Appendix Table 2.04.6 -2 the summary table for the overburden data, WFC <br />presents total results for Mercury, Mo, and Se. For mercury we understand that only a total <br />digestion can be done, but for Mo and Se both total and soluble fractions were analyzed for all <br />overburden samples. Please clarify why the total result was presented on Appendix Table <br />2.04.6 -2 instead of the soluble fraction as suggested by our guidelines for Se and Mo. Also the <br />data shown on Table 2.04.6 -2 (page 10) do not match the information presented on Appendix <br />Table 2.04.6 -2 for Hg, Mo, and Se. On Table 2.04.6 -2 the sample results are listed as soluble <br />but they appear to be the total fraction. Please clarify these discrepancies and ensure that there <br />is consistency between Table 2.04.6 -2 and Appendix Table 2.04.6 -2. <br />At the top of the second page of Appendix Table 2.04.6 -2 the column for NHN 11 -3 data is <br />incorrectly labeled NHN11 -1. Please correct this if appropriate. <br />Response — The total digestion results for Se and Mo were presented on Table 2.04.6 -2 <br />and Appendix Table 2.04.6 -2 in error. Both tables have been corrected. <br />8. DRMS: The Division requested that the analytical laboratory reports for the data presented <br />in Table 2.04.6 -2 for the five (5) overburden sample holes (1C, 3C, 695E, 697E and 775E) <br />for which data are provided from New Horizon 1 Mine Area be included as an Appendix to <br />the NUN permit application. These data were not provided in Appendix 2.04.6 -4 as <br />indicated in WFC's response. If available, please include the laboratory reports as originally <br />requested. <br />Page 6 <br />