My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-05-24_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981037
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981037
>
2000-05-24_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981037
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2021 8:06:54 PM
Creation date
11/29/2011 8:20:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981037
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
5/24/2000
Doc Name
MLRB Transcript
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DAB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />1 obligations. Let me talk a little bit about that. <br />2 During 1997, my predecessor, Susan <br />3 McCanan, the previous coal program supervisor, went to <br />4 the budget powers that be and worked very hard to <br />5 obtain additional moneys from the severance tax funds <br />6 to do some additional reclamation work at six eligible <br />7 coal mines for which the bond had been forfeited and we <br />8 felt like there could be more work done on the ground. <br />9 In fact, the division was able to secure <br />10 $190,000 for the six eligible sites. GEC was one of <br />11 those sites, and the moneys were granted to the DMG <br />12 through the long bill effective July 1st, 1998. Along <br />13 with those moneys came a stipulation that the moneys <br />14 would either be spent or returned to the state coffers <br />15 July 1, 2001. So those moneys were either spent or <br />16 they reverted back to the state one year from this <br />17 coming July. <br />18 The DMG dedicated about $70,000 to the <br />19 GEC project. We did some rough budgeting. We decided <br />20 which sites we could do work on and which sites we <br />21 couldn't do work on, and again, about 70 grand, give or <br />22 take, was dedicated to the GEC project, and last summer <br />23 we, the division, proceeded with discussions with the <br />24 Corley Company to decide how that money should be spent <br />25 at this project and what the project priorities should <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.