My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-05-24_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981037
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981037
>
2000-05-24_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981037
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2021 8:06:54 PM
Creation date
11/29/2011 8:20:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981037
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
5/24/2000
Doc Name
MLRB Transcript
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DAB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />20 <br />1 One, he objected to the project manager. <br />2 Two, he thought the road construction was overdesigned <br />3 and overvalued. And three, that there could be a <br />4 chance of off -site impacts at the property as it exists <br />5 now. <br />6 MR. CATTANY: But your jurisdiction <br />7 would be over two and three, right? <br />8 MR. AUSTIN: I hesitate to speculate on <br />9 that, to be perfectly honest. Certainly we have <br />10 nothing to do with the project manager selection. As I <br />11 indicated, the funding is from a source that we don't <br />12 have any involvement with. So I'm not sure we'd be <br />13 involved there either. Mitch has gone down and just <br />14 reviewed our process for determining off -site impacts, <br />15 and that's an ongoing study that well conclude here by <br />16 the end of September for all the bond forfeiture sites <br />17 in the state as well as GEC. <br />18 MR. STARNER: This is a discussion item. <br />19 Mr. Corley, do you have any further comment? <br />20 MR. CORLEY: No, sir. <br />21 MR. STARNER: Anybody else have any <br />22 further comments on it? Guess well have to -- it's <br />23 our position, then, that were very glad to hear the <br />24 discussion on it. If there's ever a formal complaint <br />25 brought to our board, then it'll have to be addressed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.