My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-05-24_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981037
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981037
>
2000-05-24_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981037
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2021 8:06:54 PM
Creation date
11/29/2011 8:20:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981037
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
5/24/2000
Doc Name
MLRB Transcript
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DAB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />12 <br />1 chewed on and that there would be no variance from the <br />2 bid, no variance from the plan of the project and it <br />3 was all or nothing. <br />4 And at that point we said we don't want <br />5 to waste these precious dollars, and we declined to see <br />6 the project go through. Yes, I have asked for a <br />7 session with you folks to at least bring you my <br />8 concerns, and I have six specific questions. <br />9 Has the available money been spent <br />10 wisely? Probably not something the board can say yes <br />11 or no at this point. What are the landowner's right? <br />12 Does the landowner have the right to exclude a division <br />13 employee for cause? Does the landowner have a right to <br />14 prevent additional undisturbed areas from being used as <br />15 fill material? <br />16 Dave tells me that other folks in AML <br />17 say that they didn't even have to come to staff for <br />18 permission on that. Is the division correct that no <br />19 more reclamation will be done at GEC? And if no more <br />20 reclamation should be done, should the division stop <br />21 inspecting? <br />22 I have also asked OSM to attend the <br />23 meeting this morning and have requested if they have <br />24 any suggestions because they, too, have inspected the <br />25 site in February, and they found that there was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.