My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-11-28_REVISION - M1986015
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1986015
>
2011-11-28_REVISION - M1986015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:44:23 PM
Creation date
11/29/2011 7:34:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1986015
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
11/28/2011
Doc Name
Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
Continental Materials Corporation and Tuttle & Associates
Type & Sequence
AM4
Email Name
TC1
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Laroche and Mr. Tuttle <br />Page 2 <br />November 28, 2011 <br />APPLICATION <br />1. Page 2, Item 9 — Some clarification is required: <br />a. The Section is entered as 35. The previous application listed the Section as 34. <br />The Division understands both sections are included in the mine location. Please <br />verify the intent in changing the Section number was that the majority of the <br />Amendment 4 activity will occur in Section 35, instead of Section 34. <br />b. Quarter Section & Quarter /Quarter Section: It appears the appropriate boxes to <br />check were reversed between the Quarter and Quarter /Quarter lines. The Division <br />believes the appropriate Quarter Section should be "NW" (not "SE" as checked) <br />and the Quarter /Quarter Section should be "SE" (not "NW" as checked). Please <br />confirm or clarify. <br />6.4 SPECIFIC EXHIBIT REQUIREMENTS — REGULAR 112 OPERATIONS <br />The following items must be addressed by the applicant in order to satisfy the requirements <br />of C.R.S. 34- 32.5 -101 et seq. and the Mineral Rules and Regulations of the Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board: <br />6.4.1 EXHIBIT A - A - Legal Description <br />2. Please explain why the description including the drainage easement in the Brown <br />Subdivision was not removed and why the plat of the Brown Subdivision is still included <br />as within the permit boundary. <br />6.4.2 EXHIBIT B - Index Map <br />This section is adequate as submitted. <br />6.4.3 EXHIBIT C - Pre - mining and Mining Plan Map(s) of Affected Lands <br />3. Exhibit C: <br />a. Rule 6.2.1(2)(b) requires Maps and Exhibits be prepared and signed by a <br />registered land surveyor, professional engineer, or other qualified person. Please <br />include the appropriate signature and date on both Exhibit C, and "Exhibit C — <br />Mining Sections ". <br />b. The 150 -ft drainage easement in the Brown Subdivision is included as part of the <br />permit boundary on Exhibit C. Please remove the area from Exhibit C. <br />c. The "straight line" permit boundary on the south side of the Phase 7 area follows <br />the property boundary instead of staying north of the Arkansas River and <br />following the irregular shape of the proposed Phase 7 excavation. Please correct <br />the permit boundary as appropriate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.