Laserfiche WebLink
NOV 032011 <br />Division u; rteciamation, <br />Mining and Safety <br />Dear Ms. Repp: <br />United States Department of the Interior <br />OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING <br />Reclamation and Enforcement <br />Western Region Office <br />1999 Broadway, Suite 3320 <br />Denver, CO 80202 -3050 <br />November 1, 2011 <br />Ms. Pam Repp, Acting Western Colorado Supervisor <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />Ecological Services - - <br />Western Colorado Office <br />764 Horizon Drive, Building B <br />Grand Junction, Colorado 81506 -3946 <br />RE: Biological Assessment (BA) Addendum #2 for Fruita Loadout Facility <br />CO - 0026 <br />This is the second addendum to the Biological Assessment for the CAM- Colorado, LLC <br />McClane Canyon Mine Expansion Project and Fruita Loadout Facility submitted to the U.S. Fish <br />and Wildlife Service on September 26, 2011. This addendum provides further clarification for <br />the Fruita Loadout Facility and includes a revised Map 3 with callouts for the various drainages. <br />This addendum does not include any additional clarification for the McClane Canyon Mine; <br />however, a revised Map 2 is included with callouts for the various drainages. <br />Hydrology - Fruita Loadout Facility <br />After review of Map 3 in the BA, FWS had questioned the apparent presence of two tributaries <br />to Reed Wash that would be crossed by the proposed railroad spur. Neither was addressed in the <br />BA because available information indicated they were not tributaries to Reed Wash. ERO <br />Resources Corporation conducted wetland evaluations on the Loadout Facility during 2010. The <br />apparent tributaries were included in the wetland evaluation and were described as swales but <br />were determined to not be wetlands and were not Waters of the United States. The swales are <br />vegetated with wetland and upland plant species but no hydric soils were present. Further, there <br />were no wetland hydrology indicators present, including drainage patterns, and the swales <br />apparently do not convey water to Reed Wash on a daily or seasonal basis. <br />The proposed railroad spur would cross the two swales and culverts have been proposed at each <br />crossing location. J.E. Stover & Associates, Inc. modeled runoff through each culvert during a <br />100 -year 24 -hour precipitation event of 2.2 inches. Peak runoff volumes through the culverts <br />during the 100 -year event were estimated at 2.19 cfs (west swale culvert) and 3.32 cfs (east <br />swale culvert). Flows through the culverts during 100 -year precipitation events might reach <br />Reed Wash and during such events, overland flows from uplands adjacent to Reed Wash would <br />be expected and any contaminants present on the ground surface, whether Project- related or not, <br />could be flushed into Reed Wash. <br />