My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-10-31_REVISION - M1976009HR (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1976009
>
2011-10-31_REVISION - M1976009HR (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:44:22 PM
Creation date
11/1/2011 10:38:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1976009HR
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/31/2011
Doc Name
Submittal
From
Schmidt Construction Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Reclamation Plan <br />and unless the profile is exactly right could cause more problems than it would solve. Therefore, <br />most of the slide debris was cleaned out of the meander. That provides the opportunity for the stream <br />to move toward that pre - landslide condition without having to remove so much debris to achieve that <br />end. There is still a lot of material that would need to be eroded by the stream, so the grading did not <br />create a condition where the stream would "jump" into that alignment quickly. By providing enough <br />blockage that the stream has to work hard to reach that alignment, it allows a good deal of time for <br />any other adjustments upstream or downstream from this area to occur before the new (original pre - <br />landslide) alignment is reached. <br />Wildlife Resources <br />No impact of any significance on wildlife resources occurred as a result of this rehabilitation. <br />This part of Turkey Creek, because it tends to be somewhat ephemeral, does not contain a fisheries <br />resource. The loss of habitat outside the stream channel amounted to about 1,500 square feet, all <br />located along the east bank of the stream. This vegetation was primarily woody shrubs and vines and <br />those are already recovering. Thus, the habitat loss will quickly be replaced to its original condition. <br />However, there is a positive impact on habitat in that the bench created on the west bank will <br />replace a steep and rocky talus slope that originally had little vegetation cover. The bench will <br />provide the opportunity for the establishment of herbaceous and woody growth far in excess of what <br />was originally there. The net result on wildlife resources will be positive. <br />Topsoiling and Growth Media <br />Depth of Growth Medium: No topsoiling occurred on the east bank of the stream because, <br />except for superficial damages, there was no impact on the existing soils. Topsoiling would actually <br />hinder the recovery by making it more difficult for the regrowth of the shrubs and vines. <br />No topsoil is needed on the bench because that is composed mostly of weathered landslide debris <br />and is fully capable of supporting growth without additional plant growth media. <br />Soil in the Rim Rehabilitation area (see Exhibit F - Reclamation Plan Map) will range from one <br />foot where there is already considerable fines to as much as two to three feet in rocky areas. It is <br />estimated that about 40% of the regraded surface will probably end up toward the rocky end of the <br />spectrum. All of this effort, though, is actually part of the quarry reclamation as it is above the <br />Mining Limit and was originally expected to be mined and reclaimed according to the permitted <br />plan. <br />Revegetation <br />The only area to be revegetated will be the bench on the west side of the stream. The east side of <br />the stream does not require reseeding or planting as the soils were only superficially disturbed. <br />Menzer Quarry Corrective Action Amendment Exhibit E October 2011 Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.