My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999-12-15_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1999051
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1999051
>
1999-12-15_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1999051
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2021 7:44:03 AM
Creation date
10/24/2011 1:07:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999051
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
12/15/1999
Doc Name
Memos and Letters
From
DRMS
To
Various
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jerry Daub: <br />I'll propose hourly. So you have 24 data points in one day. <br />Paul von Guerard: <br />Is that an additional well? <br />Roger Day: <br />Rosemont or any other system that we might buy has a continuous input but it will average it <br />over intervals. At White River, I think we were using 6 minutes. It would take the average <br />of 6 minutes and enter that data point, and the average for the next 6 minutes and enter that <br />data point. So the greatest sophistication of data that we retained was 6- minute intervals. <br />Then you can total it hourly and plot it, or every 6 minutes and plot it— you've got all kinds <br />of flexibility, but the foundation is that average for 6 minutes. You can just tell it to do <br />averages for 1 minutes, but it's kind of meaningless. <br />Jerry Daub: <br />In the well field, that's the one area we're looking at monitoring for water level. The other <br />thing AmerAlia is proposing is to monitor the B- Groove, which on that hydrostratigraphic <br />column is immediately below the base of the Mahogany Zone. That's at roughly a depth of <br />1,440 ft or so. <br />Jerry Daub: <br />That would be an additional well. <br />Roger Day: <br />It's a philosophy thing here. During the oil shale days of the 1970s and 80s, the attempts by <br />industry and the agencies up there with these multiple completions in one borehole had poor <br />success. I walked away from that believing that good data comes from individual wells to <br />each zone, and anything short of that is suspect. So, we'll put our money into this thing, but <br />we want data we can trust with individual wells to each zone. <br />Paul von Guerard: <br />This is a new well, it's not the TH- 75 -7B? <br />Roger Day: <br />I guess you have a choice of a bunch of wells with multiple completion or fewer individual <br />wells, for the same cost. I'd rather have a smaller amount of bullet proof data then a bunch <br />of data that we're arguing about whether or not it is cross - communicating and so forth. The <br />noise of the multiple completion, I think, is very damaging. I'd rather have a smaller amount <br />of data that I absolutely knew was right. <br />Paul von Guerard: <br />But you are talking about constructing a well to the B- Groove there at the well field. <br />Roger Day: <br />Yes, that's right. <br />1 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.