My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999-12-15_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1999051
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1999051
>
1999-12-15_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1999051
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2021 7:44:03 AM
Creation date
10/24/2011 1:07:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999051
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
12/15/1999
Doc Name
Memos and Letters
From
DRMS
To
Various
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jerry Daub: <br />What AmerAlia is proposing is in the area of the well field is one well drilled to the <br />dissolution surface to monitor the water level. That's basically a transducer, so you'd have <br />full time recording with probably a digital readout. We'd end up being able to measure water <br />levels at the dissolution surface in the area of the well field. <br />Paul von Guerard: <br />Would that be real time? <br />Jerry Daub: <br />Yes, that would be real time. <br />Roger Day: <br />We'd be monitoring the dissolution surface similar to the dissolution surface well at the <br />White River Nahcolite Minerals_ That one reports to the Rosemont control system. We <br />think that provides major protection. At White River, very small changes in injection and <br />recovery are observed. The water column is seen going up and down. It was very <br />responsive. We will record and observe the pressure. Abnormalities can be alarmed. <br />Dan Jackson: <br />How often is that looked at? I understand that it's probably recording, is that the situation? Is <br />there an alarm set, or how would that work in real time as far as an emergency? <br />Roger Day: <br />It can be alarmed. You've got all kinds of options with the system to alarm it. But the <br />primary thing there was a daily observation by the supervision of the mine. We'd show up <br />every morning and look at it to see if anything went up or down and make the changes. <br />Some changes you could see the effect in 8 hours, but generally it was the next day that <br />you'd see if you'd done something right or wrong, if it adequately made a response. It was <br />more of a database thing that you'd look at the data, make a decision and check it again a day <br />later. <br />Ned Banta: <br />How about recording water levels? How frequently would those be recorded? <br />Roger Day: <br />This transducer is the level indicator. That's recording the changes in the level to include in <br />the database. <br />Ned Banta: <br />Presumably you were going to save that until the computer test so some frequency could be <br />included. <br />Roger Day: <br />This is what we're here to work out. There's a monthly report that was submitted at White <br />River. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.