My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999-12-15_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1999051
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1999051
>
1999-12-15_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1999051
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2021 7:44:03 AM
Creation date
10/24/2011 1:07:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999051
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
12/15/1999
Doc Name
Memos and Letters
From
DRMS
To
Various
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Everybody: <br />Silt, yeah, I'll go there! Now you're talking. <br />Jerry Daub: <br />Well, that's the next one. It'll be on the other side of the hill. I was thinking maybe Vail, or <br />Eagle, or Silt or Glenwood or something <br />Allen Sorenson: <br />The point I want to get across to you is in terms of getting here and getting input for the plan <br />that you're producing, when we had a meeting similar to this with American Soda in March. <br />The level of review was a lot more mature than what we're dealing here with your <br />application. So, at this point I can't tell you that we're giving you all the input at this <br />meeting, because I don't know if we're ready to do that yet. <br />Jerry Daub: <br />What we envision is submittal of a groundwater monitoring plan to DMG, EPA, BLM, and <br />Rio Blanco County. And hopefully it will be the same plan at each agency. We're planning <br />on addressing the issues of the laboratory being certifiable and that type of thing. We'll <br />definitely have a section on QA and QC. <br />I don't know how many people here are planning on leaving right at 4:00 p.m. We have <br />about 20 minutes here. Is there any other discussion or suggestions on the groundwater? <br />Paul von Guerard: <br />Just keep it going either way, surface or ground, springs inventory, springs sampling. Is <br />there anything in the vicinity as far as identification. <br />Roger Day: <br />I think between Duck Creek and Yellow there are no springs. <br />Jerry Daub: <br />I have a spring identification map that was done probably in the mid to late 1980s. I didn't <br />bring that with me, but it covers that same area that you're looking at. But, I'm not aware of <br />any springs in the immediate area of the Rock School Lease. <br />Paul von Guerard: <br />Are there any thoughts that you'll be sampling that, just kind of a background level? <br />Roger Day: <br />If there are some out there, it might make sense to consider that. But if there aren't any out <br />there... Another thing we might add to the monitoring, we have access to the shallow well <br />that BLM uses for its system range grassing uses. It's certainly another possibility for getting <br />some water quality. Probably somewhere along here we're probably going to use some <br />shallow wells for our water supply, especially during the first couple of years. Our <br />monitoring wells will be recovering out of the Yellow Creek alluvial and we'll have water <br />quality data generated from that. As far as springs, we'll put that one well in the alluvial and <br />we'll be consuming water and monitoring that. <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.