Laserfiche WebLink
Atterberg Limits tests were run to test the variability of the red clay <br /> gouge encountered at different intervals in the various borings and as <br /> another, indirect measurement of likely strength properties of the <br /> material. The results indicate variability of the material from a <br /> nonplastic silt (ML) to a relatively high plasticity lean clay (CL). One <br /> of the five samples was nonplastic, one was a low plasticity silt(ML), <br /> and three were lean clays (CL) with liquid limits ranging from 35 to <br /> 47 percent and plasticity indices all at about 21 percent. Based on <br /> ' standard correlations, these results indicate a drained value for(D of <br /> approximately 30 degrees. <br /> 5. Inclinometer <br /> A temporary inclinometer consisting of 54.7 ft of 1-1/4 in. PVC pipe <br /> ' inserted in inclined Boring B104 was used to measure possible <br /> subsurface movement prior to constructing the repair of the slide. <br /> The casing had a 2 ft stickup and was, therefore installed to 52.7 ft, <br /> ' approximately 10 ft below the deepest clay seam encountered in the <br /> core for this boring. <br /> ' Boring B 104 was completed on 12 March 1996 and the casing <br /> installed within the next several days. Approximately one month after <br /> the installation, probing the casing with a weighted tape revealed tight <br /> (distorted) spots at approximate depths of 25 ft, 38 ft, and 45 ft, <br /> roughly coinciding with the depths of the three clay shears <br /> encountered during drilling confirming continued movement along <br /> ' these features. Several weeks later, the casing was blocked at the <br /> deeper spot and the inclinometer was destroyed by repair activities <br /> soon thereafter. <br /> ' 6. Survey <br /> Twenty pre-repair surface survey monitor points (1001 through 1020) <br /> ' were installed as shown on the figure in Appendix D to monitor slope <br /> movements and help analyze the failure mechanism/geometry. <br /> Displacement versus time plots for these points included in Appendix <br /> ' D illustrate from zero to approximately 1.6 ft of total displacement of <br /> the points from their installation in late January 1996 through their <br /> destruction during repair activities in late March/early April 1996. <br /> The displacements measured include active points within the slide <br /> mass as well as points outside the obvious slide area to confirm <br /> stability behind the visible scarps that developed. <br /> As important as the displacement amounts are the displacement <br /> vectors, shown in the figure at the back of Appendix D. These data, <br /> ' combined with the mapping and drilling data, confirm west-southwest <br /> movement of the slide mass along the slide plane. <br /> ' 13 G:\PROJECTS\20200\002\96ANNRPr.WPD <br /> 'o <br />