My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-10-11_REVISION - M1981185
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2011-10-11_REVISION - M1981185
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:58:22 PM
Creation date
10/12/2011 9:21:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/11/2011
Doc Name
Response to 6th adequacy letter to CN-01
From
GreenbergTraurig for Wildcat Mining Corporation
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
CN1
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Wallace H. Erickson <br />Response to Sixth Adequacy <br />October 11, 2011 <br />Page 6 <br />data in the fourth column should be identical to the acreages provided in the second and <br />third columns, dated April 18 and April 27, 2011. <br />b. The acreage values provided in the fifth data column, dated August 8, <br />2011, contain errors in acreage for May Day East, Base of Operations, and the New <br />Access Road, which carry through to the erroneous totals at 43.23 acres and 33.54 acres. <br />The correct total acreage for the August submittal is 44.23 acres. <br />c. The acreage values provided in the sixth data column, dated September 8, <br />2011, are supported only by Figure C -4 and conflict with the acreage values provided in <br />Exhibit A and Exhibit E, also submitted on September 9, 2011 (see comments under <br />adequacy issue number 2, above). <br />d. Footnote number 7 on Attachment 2 is in error. The acreage for the May <br />Day 1 was represented as 3.5 acres and not 13.5 acres. <br />e. Footnote number 8 on Attachment 2 is in error. As depicted on the <br />application maps, the configuration of the boundary of affected lands for the May Day 1 <br />has changed since the amendment to CN -01, filed April 27, 2011. <br />f. Footnote number 11 on Attachment 2 is in error. As depicted on the <br />application maps, the configuration of the boundary of affected lands for the May Day 2 <br />has changed since the amendment to CN -01, filed April 27, 2011. <br />g. Footnote number 12 on Attachment 2 is in error. As depicted on the <br />application maps, the configuration of the boundary of affected lands for the May Day 3 <br />(Lamb) has changed since the amendment to CN -01, filed April 27, 2011. <br />h. Footnote number 21 on Attachment 2 is in error. As depicted on the <br />application maps, the configuration of the boundary of affected lands for the New Access <br />Road has changed since the amendment to CN -01, filed April 27, 2011. <br />Pursuant to Rule 1.4.1(3), all information submitted in an application must be <br />accurate and complete. Please submit a revised Attachment 2, which displays accurate <br />information. <br />Response to Adequacy Issue No. 3. <br />Wildcat withdraws Attachment 2 to its Response to Fifth Adequacy. <br />Adequacy Issue No. 4. <br />If the Applicant desires to avoid a second amendment to CN -01, and return to the <br />affected land acreages declared with the first amendment, then all maps showing the <br />affected land boundary for the New Access Road must be revised to accurately portray <br />DEN 97,629,117v1 10 -11 -11 <br />GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP ® ATTORNEYS AT LAW ® WWW.GTLAW.COM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.