Laserfiche WebLink
Base of Operations <br />1.0 <br />0.95 <br />-0.05 <br />Exploration Drilling <br />15.8 <br />0 <br />-15.8 <br />Pre - existing Roads <br />9.5 <br />8.92 <br />-0.58 <br />New Access Road <br />1.8 <br />2.36 <br />+0.56 <br />Affected Land Totals <br />47.6 <br />33.08 <br />-14.52 <br />Mr. Wallace H. Erickson <br />Response to Sixth Adequacy <br />October 11, 2011 <br />Page 5 <br />Please correct the inconsistencies regarding the affected land acreages. Please <br />eliminate contradictory information within the text of the application, between the text and <br />the maps of the application, and between the maps of the application. Please ensure all <br />application materials consistently describe the same affected land acreages and affected <br />land boundaries. Pursuant to Rule 1.1(6), the submittal constitutes an amendment to CN- <br />01. Please complete the filing process for this second amendment to CN -01, as previously <br />required for the first amendment to CN -01. <br />Alternately, if the Applicant did not intend to expand the boundary of affected <br />lands, please correct the application to reflect no increase in affected lands as of the first <br />amendment, filed April 27, 2011. The Applicant has indicated the removal of the <br />exploration drill pads and associated access roads, resulting in 15.8 acres decrease in <br />affected lands. Therefore, the acreages of each of the areas of affected lands must not <br />exceed the acreages provided in Exhibit A of the April 27th filing, totaling not more than <br />31.8 acres. <br />Response to Adequacy Issue No. 2. <br />Wildcat has clarified the affected lands contained in its permit application to <br />reflect that it proposes only 31.4 acres of affected lands. Wildcat has corrected all <br />inconsistencies regarding the affected land acreages, and has eliminated all contradictory <br />information in the text of the application, between the text and the maps of the application, <br />and between the maps of the application. Wildcat incorporates by reference its <br />Supplemental Response to Fifth Adequacy dated September 27, 2011, which included <br />corrected application materials. See also infra Response to Adequacy Issue No. 4. <br />Adequacy Issue No. 3. <br />During a meeting with the Applicant on August 30, 2011, the Applicant submitted <br />Attachment 2, Response to Fifth Adequacy. A revised Attachment 2, Response to Fifth <br />Adequacy was submitted on September 9, 2011. The revised Attachment 2 contains <br />numerous errors and as such, does not comply with the requirements of Rule 1.4.1(3). <br />a. The acreage values provided in the fourth data column, dated June 6, <br />2011, contain errors in acreage for May Day 1 and Idaho, which carry through to the <br />erroneous totals at 54.1 acres and 44.1 acres. The correct total acreage for the June <br />submittal is 47.6 acres. There were no changes in acreage for the June submittal and the <br />DEN 97,629,117v1 10 -11 -11 <br />GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP m ATTORNEYS AT LAW ® WWW.GTLAW.COM <br />