My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-10-11_REVISION - M1981185
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2011-10-11_REVISION - M1981185
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:58:22 PM
Creation date
10/12/2011 9:21:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/11/2011
Doc Name
Response to 6th adequacy letter to CN-01
From
GreenbergTraurig for Wildcat Mining Corporation
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
CN1
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Wallace H. Erickson <br />Response to September 27, 2011 Cazier Memorandum <br />October 11, 2011 <br />Page 6 <br />Adequacy Issue No. 10. <br />a. This has not been corrected on the revised drawing (Attachment D -3, Figure D -1 <br />(dated 9/7/2011). The profile still does not show cover over the culvert, nor does <br />the profile indicate there are two culverts. Please revise the ditch profile to show the <br />cover thickness over the culvert(s), provide consistency between the plan and profile <br />as to whether one or two culverts are intended. <br />b. See supra Comment to Adequacy Issue No. 10a. <br />c. Based on the new drawing submittal, Attachment D -3, Figure D -1 and Table U -6 <br />are now consistent with respect to the bottom width of the proposed channel. <br />d. The applicant has committed to resolving this adequacy issue. However, they have <br />not committed to addressing this adequacy issue in a TR or AM. Please provide a <br />written commitment to resolve this work plan adequacy issue via the TR or AM <br />process. The bulleted response to this adequacy issue presented in the subject <br />response letter shall be included in the revised Work Plan. <br />Response to Adequacy Issue No. 10. <br />Response to Adequacy Issue No. 10.a. <br />Wildcat submitted a revised Attachment D -3, Figure D -1 indicating there are two <br />culverts, and showing ditch profile and cover thickness over the culverts in its <br />Supplemental Response to Fifth Adequacy dated September 28, 2011 <br />Response to Adequacy Issue No. 10.b. <br />See supra Response to Adequacy Issue No. 10.a. <br />Response to Adequacy Issue No. 10.c. <br />No response is required to Adequacy Issue No. 10.c. <br />Response to Adequacy Issue No. 10.d. <br />Wildcat will add another bullet under the "Quality Assurance" section at Page 5 <br />of Attachment D -3, as follows: <br />• In the event observations relating to placement of rock check dams result in <br />the need to modify the design for rock check dams or culverts, Wildcat will <br />submit such modified design to DRMS for review and approval through the <br />Technical Revision or Amendment process. <br />DEN 97,627,904v1 10 -11 -11 <br />GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP ® ATTORNEYS AT LAW ® WWW.GTLAW.COM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.