Laserfiche WebLink
be required to flow over the small section of road (and be contained on the road surface) <br />over culvert C -3. <br />The Division believes that it would be unlikely that all surface runoff will flow into ditches <br />D -5 and D -6. The western most portion of the area behind and around the buildings is of <br />particular concern with proposed disturbed area runoff flowing into undisturbed areas <br />untreated. The northern boundary of the proposed additional disturbed area will need to <br />provide adequate runoff diversions to ensure that all disturbed area runoff is treated <br />before leaving the disturbed area. <br />Please provide any revised text, exhibits, or maps describing the manner in which New <br />Elk Coal Company will comply with the requirements 4.05.2(1). <br />2. Division initial comment: Regarding proposed revised pages 2.05 -27, 2.05 -27a, and 2.05 -6a <br />(Table 19), proposed revised Map 11 -Sheet 3, and proposed revised Exhibit 28, please have <br />New Elk revise these materials to remove references to the 200' fixed conveyor, the 500' <br />temporary conveyor, and demolition and mob /demo associated with the radial stacker pads and <br />conveyor footings. It's my understanding that these pieces of equipment will be addressed via <br />Minor Revision MR97, which the Division is also currently reviewing. <br />New Elk response: Please withdraw pages 2.05 -27 and 2.05 -27a from further consideration in <br />this technical revision. These two pages only describe the refuse conveyors and are included in <br />MR -97. Enclosed are amended Table 19 and Map 11 -Sheet 3. <br />Division response: This response is adequate. <br />0. Division initial comment: The Division has compiled a reclamation cost estimate for the tasks <br />associated with the reclamation of the C &W Train Shop Facilities Area. This estimate is <br />sufficient to reclaim all areas associated with the proposed addition of facilities under TR59. <br />Based on discussions with New Elk, the proposed 200 ft fixed conveyor, 500 ft temp. conveyor <br />and demolition work associated with the radial stacker pads and conveyor footings will be <br />bonded under Minor Revision MR97. As such, those tasks have not been included in the <br />Division's cost estimate. New Elk submitted a reclamation cost estimate in the amount of <br />$158,716, which included those tasks omitted in the Division's estimate. The Division's total <br />reclamation costs associated with these activities are estimated to be $119,730.94. Please have <br />New Elk acknowledge if they concur with the Division's estimate. <br />NECC response: The DRMS' reclamation estimate was incorporated into NECC's Exhibit 28. <br />NECC accepts the $119,730.94 reclamation cost estimate. <br />Division response: This response is adequate. Please not that a revision to the reclamation <br />cost estimate may be required based on NECC's response to adequate comment no. 1. <br />