Laserfiche WebLink
Fairplay — Destiny Placer Mine EA - Socioeconomic and Environmental Justice Report <br />that during the operational life of a disamenity original homeowners realize a net loss in <br />property value. However, they also report that "if after the adjustment is complete the <br />facility is regarded as innocuous, prices will rebound and the total change in social <br />welfare will be zero. In this case, however, a substantial transfer of welfare may have <br />occurred from buyers to sellers" (Kiel and McClain, 1993). Therefore from a net public <br />benefits perspective, there is likely to be no change in social welfare over the long run. <br />This is likely to be the case of the Destiny Mine. Initial losses in property value would be <br />re- gained after operation concludes, and it may be the case the reclamation efforts leave <br />the site more visually and aesthetically valuable than under its current state. This could <br />even result in upward pressure on nearby residential property values in the long -run. <br />However, evidence suggests that in the near -term property values would be negatively <br />impacted by the mining operation. The degree to which is unknown. There are no <br />studies that accurately depict the state of affairs at this specific site, therefore, citing a <br />benefits transfer from other studies would be unreliable. Currently the site is open to <br />recreation use and accessible by nearby residents. The proposed mining site consists of <br />4.84 acres out of an 80 acre BLM parcel zoned for mining. The proposed mining site <br />would be closed to public access which could generate some negative externalities. <br />Those externalities include those discussed above such as, loss of access, scenic quality, <br />noise, dust and increased commercial traffic. Through proper management many of these <br />effects are mitigatable. <br />As discussed above, mining has a long history in Park County. Substantial evidence of <br />past and present mining operations exists around the proposed site. In addition to <br />remnants from mining operations, residential developers have left rock piles and holes <br />disturbing the immediate landscape. There are currently five homes adjacent to the <br />proposed site; however, it appears that only one is occupied. Residents of these homes <br />would be most affected by mining activities. Concealing the mining operation by <br />landscaping with native grasses and trees would reduce the visual effects to nearby <br />property owners. Additionally, building a trail around the mine to other open areas would <br />allow for continued multiple use access by residents. This would help mitigate any <br />negative impacts to social values occurring from closing the site to recreational use. <br />Commercial traffic would enter through the south access road and would not affect <br />roadways for the homes adjacent to the mining site. There is a home located near the <br />south access road that would experience increased truck traffic, but the operator has <br />agreed to move the entrance to the access road away from their driveway to mitigate <br />traffic conflicts. <br />The air quality analysis estimates the impacts to air quality resulting from the proposed <br />action. It is anticipated that long -term and moderately adverse impacts would occur to <br />immediate homeowners, long term and minor impacts to Park County, and long -term but <br />negligible impacts to Colorado, relative to the existing conditions. It is likely that <br />realized socioeconomic effects from changes in air quality would occur within close <br />proximity to the mining site. At the time of this analysis, occupancy rates of nearby <br />homes are low; however, any adverse impacts realized by existing homeowners would <br />increase the socioeconomic costs associated with this alternative. Such costs could <br />include further reduction in property values and increased risk for health problems; <br />however, there is no reliable data that allows for a quantitative analysis of those costs. <br />Given that the nearby residential neighborhood is sparsely populated, adverse impacts <br />would be minor in relation to the entire study area; however, those impacts could be very <br />12 <br />