Laserfiche WebLink
Direct and Indirect Effects <br />Fairplay — Destiny Placer Mine EA - Socioeconomic and Environmental Justice Report <br />The proposed mining operation would have multiple effects on social and economic <br />conditions. The primary economic variables affected would be jobs, income, and <br />property values. The impact to jobs and income was modeled using 2008 IMPLAN data <br />and the level of proposed mining activities. It is assumed that mining would produce 200 <br />ounces of gold and 20,000 cubic yards of sand and gravel per month. The inputs required <br />to operate the mine include labor and capital. Therefore the mine would generate <br />economic activity in form of jobs and the purchase of local goods as inputs to production. <br />IMPLAN tracks the inter - industry purchasing patterns associated with mining and allows <br />for an estimate of the total impact to jobs and labor income in the study area. As reported <br />in Table 3, a total of 4.5 jobs and $394,342 of labor income would be generated from the <br />mining operation. The majority of jobs and income would exist in the mining sector. <br />Three jobs in that sector would be those directly operating the mine However, the local <br />purchase of inputs to production would generate additional activity in other sectors, <br />which results in the remaining employment and income. <br />Table 3: Im to Jobs and Income in Park Count <br />Source: IMPLAN 2008 <br />In addition to changes in jobs and income, it is also likely that the proposed mining <br />activities would impact residential property values near the site. There is no method <br />available for estimating the true impact to property values; however, evidence suggests <br />that mining operations tend to have a negative effect on home prices in adjacent <br />neighborhoods. Boxall et al. (2004) researched the effect of oil and natural gas mining on <br />rural residential property values. Although the mining operation proposed under this <br />alternative is different, the effects on visual quality and amenity values, as well as <br />restrictions in access, would be similar. The findings suggest that property values are <br />negatively correlated with mining activity. It is unlikely that mining activity would have <br />no effect on, or improve, residential property values; therefore it is assumed that a <br />negative correlation exists with Destiny Mine and the value of nearby homes during its <br />active life. Boxall (2004) only indicate a direction of change in property values, where as <br />Kiel and McClain (1993) suggest that there is a time component that affects the degree of <br />change in home prices resulting from an undesirable land use. Their research suggests <br />11 <br />Employment <br />Labor Income <br />Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing & Hunting <br />0.005 <br />44 <br />Mining <br />r 3.059 <br />337,559 <br />Utilities <br />0.028 <br />3,434 <br />Construction <br />0.031 <br />1,218 <br />Manufacturing <br />0.857 <br />36,002 <br />Wholesale Trade <br />0.004 <br />213 <br />Transportation & Warehousing <br />0.107 <br />2,591 <br />Retail Trade <br />0.049 <br />744 <br />Information <br />0.226 <br />3,941 <br />Finance & Insurance <br />0.114 <br />1,717 <br />Real Estate & Rental <br />0.113 <br />6,879 <br />Professional Scientific & Technical Services <br />0.000 <br />0 <br />Total <br />4.591 <br />394,342 <br />Direct and Indirect Effects <br />Fairplay — Destiny Placer Mine EA - Socioeconomic and Environmental Justice Report <br />The proposed mining operation would have multiple effects on social and economic <br />conditions. The primary economic variables affected would be jobs, income, and <br />property values. The impact to jobs and income was modeled using 2008 IMPLAN data <br />and the level of proposed mining activities. It is assumed that mining would produce 200 <br />ounces of gold and 20,000 cubic yards of sand and gravel per month. The inputs required <br />to operate the mine include labor and capital. Therefore the mine would generate <br />economic activity in form of jobs and the purchase of local goods as inputs to production. <br />IMPLAN tracks the inter - industry purchasing patterns associated with mining and allows <br />for an estimate of the total impact to jobs and labor income in the study area. As reported <br />in Table 3, a total of 4.5 jobs and $394,342 of labor income would be generated from the <br />mining operation. The majority of jobs and income would exist in the mining sector. <br />Three jobs in that sector would be those directly operating the mine However, the local <br />purchase of inputs to production would generate additional activity in other sectors, <br />which results in the remaining employment and income. <br />Table 3: Im to Jobs and Income in Park Count <br />Source: IMPLAN 2008 <br />In addition to changes in jobs and income, it is also likely that the proposed mining <br />activities would impact residential property values near the site. There is no method <br />available for estimating the true impact to property values; however, evidence suggests <br />that mining operations tend to have a negative effect on home prices in adjacent <br />neighborhoods. Boxall et al. (2004) researched the effect of oil and natural gas mining on <br />rural residential property values. Although the mining operation proposed under this <br />alternative is different, the effects on visual quality and amenity values, as well as <br />restrictions in access, would be similar. The findings suggest that property values are <br />negatively correlated with mining activity. It is unlikely that mining activity would have <br />no effect on, or improve, residential property values; therefore it is assumed that a <br />negative correlation exists with Destiny Mine and the value of nearby homes during its <br />active life. Boxall (2004) only indicate a direction of change in property values, where as <br />Kiel and McClain (1993) suggest that there is a time component that affects the degree of <br />change in home prices resulting from an undesirable land use. Their research suggests <br />11 <br />