My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-08-24_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010088
>
2011-08-24_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:37:10 PM
Creation date
10/5/2011 9:34:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010088
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
8/24/2011
Doc Name
4th Preliminary Adequacy Review
From
Marcia Talvitie
To
Mike Boulay
Email Name
MPB
SB1
MLT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C- 2010 -088 Fruita Loadout <br />4 th Preliminary Adequacy Review (MLT) <br />24- Aug -2011 <br />Page 6 of 6 <br />I. In Exhibit 14, the AVF study, a revised Page 3 was provided under a previous response. <br />The wording on this page no longer appears to "flow" with that of pages 2 and 4. Please <br />review, and revise as appropriate. <br />PAP Maps <br />J. Map 02 Surface Ownership — Please add a property line delineating the boundary between <br />the Union Pacific right -of -way and parcels 01 and 04. <br />K. Map 03 Vegetation Map — The acreages listed in the Existing Vegetation Types table total <br />208.33 acres, and appear to be derived from an earlier version of the proposed permit <br />boundary. Please revise the vegetation acreages to reflect the current permit boundary <br />encompassing 215.6 acres. <br />L. Map 07 Pre /Post Mining Land Use — The UP railroad mainline right -of -way, specifically <br />that within the permit boundary, appears to be classified as "Fish & Wildlife ". Should it <br />possibly be termed "Industrial ", instead? <br />M. Map 16 Loadout Facilities — Please remove the symbol for "Construction Material Borrow <br />Area" from the Legend, and label the Access Road. Should there be a culvert required <br />beneath Light Use Road 92 near where the road enters CAM's property? (Are there any <br />culverts beneath the railroad mainline in that vicinity ?) <br />This concludes my fourth adequacy review. Please let me know if you require additional <br />information. <br />cc: Sandy Brown, DRMS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.