My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-09-26_HYDROLOGY - M2002120
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M2002120
>
2011-09-26_HYDROLOGY - M2002120
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:43:22 PM
Creation date
9/27/2011 3:15:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002120
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
9/26/2011
Doc Name
SWSP
From
OSE
To
Civil Resources, LLC
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Andy Rodriguez <br />September 26, 2011 <br />Page 4 <br />basis or other interval acceptable to both of the . The accounting form provided with your <br />application is subject to modification and appro al by the division engineer. All amounts shall <br />be in acre -feet. <br />12. The approval of this substitute water supply pla <br />landowner of the requirement to obtain a Wate <br />augmentation or mitigation to ensure the perm . <br />long -term evaporation losses and lagged deple <br />ceased. If reclamation of the mine site will pro• <br />groundwater to evaporation, an application for <br />Division 1 Water Court at least three (3) years <br />not be limited to long -term evaporation losses <br />after reclamation, replacement of lagged deplet <br />effect on stream flow. <br />13. In accordance with the letter dated April 30, <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety <br />operators must comply with the requiremen <br />Mineral Rules and Regulations for the prote <br />letter from DRMS requires that you provide i <br />replace long term injurious stream depletio <br />of ground water. The DRMS letter identifies <br />If the information you are providing to DRM <br />numbered 1 — 3, a copy of that information n <br />Division of Water Resources). <br />In accordance with approach nos. 1 and 3, <br />obtained for $1,053,118.61 through the Divis <br />( "DRMS ") to assure that depletions from gr <br />14. This substitute water supply plan may be revok <br />determined that injury to other water rights has <br />substitute water supply plan expire without rene <br />permanent plan for augmentation, all excavatio <br />other use of water at the pit, must cease immed <br />15. In accordance with amendments to §25 -8 -202( <br />Regulations adopted on February 4, 1992, the s <br />substitute supply is of a quality to meet require <br />water quality data or analysis may be requested <br />appropriate for downstream water users. <br />does not relieve the Applicant and /or <br />Court decree approving a permanent plan for <br />nent replacement of all depletions, including <br />ions after gravel mining operations have <br />uce a permanent water surface exposing <br />plan for augmentation must be filed with the <br />rior to the completion of mining to include, but <br />nd lagged depletions. If a lined pond results <br />ons shall continue until there is no longer an <br />010 (copy attached) from the Colorado <br />"DRMS "), all sand and gravel mining <br />s of the Colorado Reclamation Act and the <br />tion of water resources. The April 30, 2010 <br />formation to DRMS to demonstrate you can <br />s that result from mining related exposure <br />four approaches to satisfy this requirement. <br />is included under the approaches <br />eds to also be provided to this office (the <br />ou have indicated that a bond has been <br />on of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety <br />undwater evaporation do not occur in the <br />unforeseen event, or events, that would lead to the abandonment of the Pit. <br />d or modified at any time should it be <br />r will occur as a result of this plan. Should this <br />al or be revoked prior to adjudication of a <br />of product from below the water table, and all <br />ately. <br />), C.R.S., and Senate Bill 89 -181 Rules and <br />ate engineer shall determine whether the <br />ents of use to senior appropriators. As such, <br />at any time to determine if the water quality is <br />16. The decision of the state engineer shall have n• precedential or evidentiary force, shall not <br />create any presumptions, shift the burden of proof, or serve as a defense in any water court <br />case or any other legal action that may be initiat -d concerning the substitute water supply plan. <br />This decision shall not bind the State Engineer to act in a similar manner in any other <br />applications involving other plans or in any proposed renewal of this plan, and shall not imply <br />concurrence with any findings of fact or conclusions of law contained herein, or with the <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.