Laserfiche WebLink
Soil Information <br />EXHIBIT I <br />At the end of this exhibit are some printouts from the NRCS website that describe many of the <br />typical characteristics of the soils present on the site. Please refer to Exhibit C -3, Soils Map, for <br />an illustration showing the distribution of the soils. <br />Most of this exhibit will concentrate on the soil characteristics of the site itself. Although a <br />particular location may be mapped as a certain NRCS soil series or form, it does not necessarily <br />mean the soil is typical for that series or form. Local factors may alter some of those <br />characteristics. <br />General Soil Type <br />The uplands at this site are occupied by the Fort Collins loam. This soil is noted for its depth, <br />excellent growth potential, and high productivity when growing conditions are good. It is a non - <br />saline soil with about a 15% calcium carbonate content which causes a somewhat alkaline <br />reaction with a pH of about 7.8 to 8.5. That pH is common in soils on the Colorado plains and is <br />not limiting to adapted vegetation species. Typically there is a clay loam layer at about 9 to 21 <br />inches, with a loam surface layer. At the proposed amendment site the loam surface layer <br />appears to have been partially lost due to past overgrazing and wind erosion. As a result, the <br />surface soils appear to be somewhat more clayey that would normally be expected with the Fort <br />Collins loam. It still produces very good growth as evidenced by the vegetation, but productivity <br />is probably less than would be found on excellent Fort Collins loam. These soils are restricted to <br />the highest elevation, nearly level portions of the site. <br />As the valley edge is approached, the topography becomes a bit more sloping and the loamy Fort <br />Collins soil gives way to the Stoneham sandy loam. The transition between these two soils is <br />very broad with soil texture becoming more and more sandy as the Stoneham replaces the Fort <br />Collins loam. At the start of the transition this soil is very deep and exhibits only slightly less <br />productivity than the Fort Collins loam, but where the Stoneham sandy loam is close to the <br />Schamber -Razor complex, the Stoneham thins rapidly and becomes much less productive. <br />The Schamber -Razor complex forms the edge of the valley and the slopes leading down into the <br />Rock Creek valley. Although the typical soil of this type exhibits a gravelly loam topsoil about <br />five inches thick, the soil on the proposed amendment area lacks much topsoil. For the most <br />part, topsoil is only barely identifiable with the deeper very gravelly loam and very gravelly sand <br />being most commonly exposed on the surface. Once again, this is probably due to wind erosion <br />removing the fines, which probably occurred as a result of past overgrazing. There appears to be <br />some local soil replacement occurring as fines from the Stoneham and the Fort Collins soils are <br />washed downslope onto the Schamber -Razor soils. <br />The slopes in the proposed amendment area are primarily occupied by the Schamber soils. The <br />Razor soils tend to appear further down the slopes, more toward the toe as they are derived from <br />the clays that underlie the gravel deposit from which the Schamber soil developed. The Razor <br />Fountain Pit M- 1982 -155 <br />DRMS 112 Permit Amendment Page 20 <br />