My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-09-23_REVISION - M1977208
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977208
>
2011-09-23_REVISION - M1977208
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:43:21 PM
Creation date
9/26/2011 12:17:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977208
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/23/2011
Doc Name
Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
CEMEX, Inc.
Type & Sequence
TR11
Email Name
MAC
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
pH <br />Chloride <br />Sulfate <br />Dissolved Solids <br />Selenium <br />Thallium <br />6.5 -8.5 <br />250 mg /1 <br />250 mg /1 <br />400 mg/1 or 1.25 <br />times the <br />background level <br />0.02 mg /1 <br />0.002 mg /1 <br />Letter to Ms. Arthur 2 September 23, 2011 <br />TR -11 Adequacy Review File No. M- 1977 -208 <br />Technical Revision — 01, approved on January 31, 2000, authorized the Operator to use C -Pit <br />as a CKD disposal site. Following the approval of TR -01, the Operator submitted the <br />analytical results from five quarters of baseline data. The Division reviewed the data and set <br />the numeric protection limits (NPL's) for the analyte suite. The NPL's were based on the <br />most restrictive water quality standards. The Division reviewed the permit file and found that <br />the analytical results of the groundwater sampling have been consistently compared to the <br />lower of either agriculture or drinking water standards. Under Technical Revision — 08, <br />approved on May 9, 2007, the Operator conducted an investigation to determine the source of <br />water entering C -Pit. Once it had been determined where the water was originating, the <br />Operator was to establish a sampling point up- gradient of C -Pit in order to determine <br />baseline conditions. The Operator reported under Technical Revision — 09, that the <br />groundwater elevation data collected in the C -Pit area were not adequate to construct a <br />surface contour map. As a result, a sampling point up- gradient of C -Pit was never <br />established. In absence of baseline data, the Division will continue to apply the lower of <br />either agriculture or drinking water standards to the CEM -005 compliance well. The <br />following table lists the numeric standards to be applied to CEM -005. <br />4. The Operator has requested the removal of streamers around the C -Pit. The Division <br />approved the removal of the net or "other surface water cover" and removal of the condition <br />of daily monitoring for wildlife under Technical Revision — 10. Therefore, the Operator may <br />remove any streamers around the C -Pit. <br />5. The Operator has proposed reducing the frequency of sampling from quarterly to semi- <br />annually for C -Pit and CEM -004 if the numeric standards have not been exceeded during the <br />first four quarters of sampling. The Division will allow sampling to be reduced to semi- <br />annually if the numeric standards have not been exceeded during the first four quarters of <br />sampling. However, if the numeric standards are exceeded during a semi - annual sampling <br />event, then the Operator will be required to resume quarterly sampling. Sampling will <br />continue on a quarterly basis until four quarters are shown to not exceed numeric standards, <br />at which time the Operator may resume semi - annual sampling. <br />6. The Operator has proposed eliminating monitoring location CEM -001 from the water <br />sampling program based on the low hydraulic conductivity in the bedrock surrounding the C- <br />Pit. The method by which the hydraulic conductivity was determined is a non - conventional <br />method; a slug test would need to be performed to verify the results of the Operator's <br />hydraulic conductivity test. The Division believes there is value to the continued sampling of <br />CEM -001, which is the only monitoring location between C -Pit and the compliance point. <br />The Operator has stated there is no value to continue sampling CEM -001 since the sampling <br />of C -Pit will provide information on how the water exposed to CKD is changing over time. <br />Sampling CEM -001 can provide information on how the chemical composition of the water <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.