My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-09-09_REVISION - C1982057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2011-09-09_REVISION - C1982057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:43:04 PM
Creation date
9/23/2011 7:42:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/9/2011
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
Seneca Coal Company
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
SLB
JDM
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tab 22 <br />Tab 23 <br />Tab 25 <br />desirable, it should be addressed with the pending Hayden Gulch Loadout permit <br />revision. <br />23. Attachment 13 -8 includes design information for the sumps at the TAHR topsoil <br />stockpiles. The designs associated with the TAHR should be removed. <br />24. Attachment 13 -10 includes the TAHR construction summary; it should be removed. <br />Tab 20 <br />25. Revised page ii no longer lists Attachment 20 -D, the Pond 016 Slide Remediation Plan. <br />Please revise the page to include reference to this attachment. <br />26. Revised page 2 does not account for the two -sided pages in the currently approved <br />permit application package. Please resubmit page 2 with page 1 on the front and page <br />2 on the back. <br />27. Page 10 includes a discussion of revegetation criteria for the TAHR. This should be <br />removed. <br />28. Pages 13 and 16 also include references to the TAHR for application of Seed Mixes No. <br />1, 2 and 3; please revise the text to omit reference to the TAHR. <br />29. Page 33 includes a table of reclaimed vegetation community types and includes <br />acreages for the TAHR. Please revise the page to exclude the TAHR. <br />30. Pages 49 and 50 include a discussion of determination of revegetation success for the <br />TAHR. This should be removed. <br />31. Page 54 includes a discussion of species diversity success demonstrations along <br />theTAHR, which should be removed. <br />32. The currently approved page 3 includes the Fish and Wildlife Plan for the TAHR; it <br />should be removed. <br />33. Page 6 includes a letter from the Division of Wildlife regarding wildlife species <br />occurrence along the TAHR; it should be removed. <br />Page 8 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.