My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-09-09_REVISION - M1981185 (43)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2011-09-09_REVISION - M1981185 (43)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:58:17 PM
Creation date
9/12/2011 12:15:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/9/2011
Doc Name
Response to Fifth Adequacy Letter
From
R Squared, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
CN1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Wallace H. Erickson <br />Response to August 19, 2011 Cazier Memorandum <br />September 9, 2011 <br />Page 8 <br />velocity. DRMS cannot verify channel design based on information in Table U -11, or <br />from pages immediately preceding or following Table U -11. <br />Response to Adequacy Issue No. 11. <br />Wildcat will correct this reference. The reference should be to Table U -6. <br />Adequacy Issue No. 12. <br />Page 8, Augmentation Pond, second to last paragraph. The first line states <br />"Embankment slopes will not be steeper than 1 (H) to 1 (V) without DRMS approval . . <br />. ". This is incorrect. DRMS will require slope stability analyses addressing a) <br />empty /dry conditions, b) full capacity conditions, and c) rapid draw down conditions for <br />any embankment design to impound water with slopes greater than 3H:1V. <br />Response to Adequacy Issue No. 12. <br />Wildcat is providing a work plan to obtain samples of native construction <br />material which will be excavated at the location of the proposed augmentation pond and <br />used to construct the pond. See Exhibit 6.5, Figure 6.5 -4; Attachment D -6. Wildcat <br />presents in its work plan an approach to obtain samples, analyze the geotechnical <br />properties of the construction material, and to perform the analyses requested by DRMS. <br />Wildcat commits to providing this analysis, and any design changes, to DRMS for <br />review and approval through the Technical Revision or Amendment process. <br />Adequacy Issue No. 13. <br />Page 9, fourth paragraph. The applicant indicates that because the embankment height is <br />less than 10 feet "the concern for dam failure through an engineered constructed berm is <br />not probable. DRMS is concerned with a berm failure in this instance with respect to <br />impacts to the hydrologic balance, pursuant to Rule 3.1.6. <br />Response to Adequacy Issue No. 13. <br />See Response to Adequacy Issue No. 12. <br />DEN 97,591,785v2 9 -9 -11 <br />GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP • ATTORNEYS AT LAW • WWW.GTLAW.COM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.