My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-09-09_REVISION - M1981185 (43)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2011-09-09_REVISION - M1981185 (43)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:58:17 PM
Creation date
9/12/2011 12:15:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/9/2011
Doc Name
Response to Fifth Adequacy Letter
From
R Squared, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
CN1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Wallace H. Erickson <br />Response to August 22, 2011 Hays Memorandum <br />September 9, 2011 <br />Page 6 <br />results of the work and providing final as -built drawing to the Division after construction <br />completion. <br />No Access Road plan or construction may be implemented without Division review and <br />approval. The Applicant must commit to submitting the new geotechnical investigation <br />information, with the revised road design if required, for Division review and approval <br />through either the Technical Revision or Amendment process prior to commencing <br />access road reconstruction activities. <br />Response to Adequacy Issue No. 6. <br />See supra Response to Adequacy Issue No. 4.a. <br />Adequacy Issue No. 7. <br />In the Pre - Construction Activities section of the Work Plan the Applicant proposes to <br />drill 6 test boring and excavate 4 test pits at the approximate location shown in <br />Attachment 6.5 -3 Figure 5. Figure 5 in Attachment 6.5.3 — Geotechnical <br />Reconnaissance Mine Access Road is a photograph of the lower portion of the retaining <br />wall and does not indicate the locations of the proposed test boring and pits. Please <br />explain this discrepancy and provide a location map for the proposed borings and pits. <br />Response to Adequacy Issue No. 7. <br />Wildcat will correct this reference as follows: "Exhibit 6.5 -3." <br />Adequacy Issue No. 8. <br />In the Pre - Construction Activities section of the Work Plan the Applicant states they will <br />perform an engineering and geologic evaluation for the stability of cut slopes in rock and <br />colluviums areas. The Applicant has not proposed test boring in these areas. Please <br />explain how the engineering and geologic evaluation will be completed without <br />additional information. <br />Response to Adequacy Issue No. 8. <br />See supra Response to Adequacy Issue No. 7. The locations of the test borings <br />proposed by Wildcat are shown on Exhibit 6.5 -3. <br />Adequacy Issue No. 9. <br />Please provide the proposed carrying load for the reconstructed access road and provide <br />justification in accordance with La Plata County requirements. <br />DEN 97, 591, 784v1 9 -9 -11 <br />GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP • ATTORNEYS AT LAW • WWW.GTLAW.COM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.