My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-08-25_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010088
>
2011-08-25_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:37:13 PM
Creation date
9/7/2011 3:11:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010088
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
8/25/2011
Doc Name
Paul Creeden Email Regarding Bridge Re-design
From
Paul Creeden
To
DRMS
Email Name
MPB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From: Creeden, Paul <br />Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 20112:08 PM <br />To: Boulay, Mike <br />Cc: Romatzke, JT <br />Subject: McClane Coal Mine Loadout Facility <br />Hi Mike- <br />I wanted to follow up on our conversation last week regarding the McClane Canyon Coal Mine Coal Loadout Facility <br />planned for the old gilsonite refinery property between Fruita and Loma. As we discussed, most of the wildlife issues we <br />identified earlier have been addressed. It appears as if the design of the Reed Wash rail crossing (spanning vs. piers in <br />the wash) is still in flux. The wash is known to be used by river otter and native Colorado River fishes. It is within <br />designated critical habitat for the Colorado pikeminnow and razorback sucker. Spanning would be less likely to <br />negatively impact fish and wildlife utilizing the wash. With spanning, impacts aquatic habitat caused by runoff could be <br />mitigated through implementation of industry recognized BMP's such as utilization of silt fences, berms, catch basins, <br />seeding, mulching, and erosion - control netting. Construction within the wash would present more challenges related to <br />impact mitigation. In that case, I anticipate our recommendations would be very similar to those provided earlier <br />related to the Redcliff Mine /Mack Wash proposal. <br />Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. Pic <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.