Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 of 2 <br />4) In the submittal dated April 12, 2011, the plan view drawings on Map 13 for ponds 1 <br />and 2 were small and difficult to read. However, in the July 11, 2011 submittal, the <br />plan view drawings on Figure 13 (Map 13 ?) are too small to read. Please submit new <br />plan view drawings of each sediment pond, at a scale that is large enough to easily <br />read the contour lines, contour intervals and elevations. <br />Section 2.05.3(4)(a)(ii)(B) on permit pages 2.05 -19 and 2.05 -20 contains a <br />description for the construction of pond embankments with discharge structures. <br />However, referring to Map 13, revised in the August 19, 2011 submittal, it appears <br />that ponds 1, 2 and 3 are completely incised, with no constructed embankment and no <br />discharge structures. If all three ponds are completely incised with only pumped <br />discharge, please revise Section 2.05.3(4)(a)(ii)(B) to describe the construction of the <br />three incised ponds. <br />The Division has no further concerns. The construction of the incised ponds was <br />described on revised page 2.05 -19 of the August 26, 2011 submittal. <br />6) Please add more detail to the discussion of pond reclamation in Section <br />2.05.3(4)(a)(ii)(D) and, as was done for the topic of road reclamation, please add a <br />reference in Section 2.05.4(2)(c) on page 2.05 -30 that a general discussion of the <br />reclamation of the sediment ponds is presented in Section 2.05.3(4)(a)(ii)(D). <br />In the August 19, 2011 submittal, CAM added additional information on pages 2.05- <br />20, 21 and 31. However, the Division requests an expanded discussion concerning <br />pond reclamation, including where the fill will come from since the ponds will be <br />incised, compaction of the fill material and whether or not topsoil will be applied. <br />The Division has no further concerns. Revised pages 2.05 -20 through 2.05 -23 were <br />provided in the August 26, 2011 submittal. <br />10) Please change "V-Ditch" to "Trapezoidal" and 0.5% slope to 8.0% slope for ditch <br />segment 3 -c in the Ditch and Culvert Design Summary on page Exh. 9 -2. <br />In the August 19, 2011 submittal, "V-Ditch" was changed to "Trapezoidal" for ditch <br />3 -c. However, a slope of 0.8% is given for the ditch while the ditch design on page <br />Exh. 9 -46 uses a slope of 8.0 %. Please reconcile this difference. <br />The Division has no further concerns. Exh. 9 -2 was revised appropriately in the <br />submittal dated August 26, 2011. <br />c: /word2007 /fruita/newappmemo5 <br />