My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-08-22_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010088
>
2011-08-22_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:37:05 PM
Creation date
8/22/2011 8:56:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010088
IBM Index Class Name
APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE
Doc Date
8/22/2011
Doc Name
Adequacy Response #3
From
J.E. Stover & Associates, Inc
To
DRMS
Email Name
MPB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mike Boulay <br />CAM: Please see revised Map -13. <br />CAM: Please see revised pages 2.05 -20, 21 and 31. <br />-7- August 19, 2011 <br />5) There appears to be an inconsistency as to what sediment control <br />structures will be constructed alongside the railroad spur line. The Map <br />21 plan view appears to show berms in place but the cross - section B -B' <br />shows that ditches will be next to the railroad track. However, on Map 16 <br />and Figure 13 (Map 13 ?), there appear to be ditches on both sides for <br />only part of the spur line. Please explain or revise the maps so that there <br />is consistency among these maps. <br />CAM: Union Pacific Standards for construction require a minimum of a 2 foot <br />ditch from the top of subballast when in cut. A typical section for the railspur <br />embankment is two feet of ballast underlain by a minimum of one foot of <br />subballast. West of Reed Wash, ditches from CW -4 to the bridge needed to be <br />redesigned and cut down 2' more. Ditches have been redesigned, and revised <br />ditches are shown on Maps 16 & 21. <br />East of Reed Wash ditches 1 -a, 1 -b, 1 -c, 2 -a and 2 -d were also redesigned and <br />cut down 2' more feet. The peak flows were evaluated for the designed ditches <br />East of Reed Wash, and the most significant change in a peak flow was +0.02 <br />cfs, which was deemed negligible, and therefore, SedCad sheets included in <br />Exhibit 9 were not revised. <br />From station 0 +00 to station 20 +00, the railspur is in fill, and therefore no ditches <br />are required, but berms are required to capture and direct runoff from <br />undisturbed flow to silt fences. At the location of B -B' on Maps -21 & 16, the <br />railspur is in cut and therefore a ditch is required. The railspur goes in and out of <br />cut from approximately station 20 +00 to the bridge. However, ditches have been <br />designed for the entire length from 20 +00 to the bridge as a way to get the water <br />to the various silt fences in order to protect the hydrologic properties of the <br />wetland type vegetation. For clarity, lines and arrows have been added to more <br />correctly delineate where the ditches are located. Berms will be used for a <br />portion of the railspur from station 20 +00 to the bridge beginning at the <br />downstream end of the ditches, and continuing parallel to the track, for a distance <br />long enough for a berm height of 2.5 feet to tie back into original ground. <br />6) Please add more detail to the discussion of pond reclamation in Section <br />2.05.3(4)(a)(ii)(D) and, as was done for the topic of road reclamation, <br />please add a reference in Section 2.05.4(2)(c) on page 2.05 -30 that a <br />general discussion of the reclamation of the sediment ponds is <br />presented in Section 2.05.3(4)(a)(ii)(D). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.