My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-08-09_REVISION - M1981185 (52)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2011-08-09_REVISION - M1981185 (52)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:58:15 PM
Creation date
8/10/2011 11:46:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/9/2011
Doc Name
CN-01 112d permit application Exhibit U Attachemnt U-5 thru Exhibit X
From
Wildcat Mining Corporation
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
CN1
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
182
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mine Rock Geochemical Analysis <br />Exhibit U — Attachment U -6 <br />several metals were based on a hardness value of 50 mg/L as CaCO3 as this was the value of the <br />potential receiving surface waters including Little Deadwood Gulch and the La Plata River. <br />Based on these results, the only analyte above any of the Basic Standards was Arsenic (0.0151 <br />mg /L) which was 10% above the Domestic Water Supply — Human Health Standard (0.01 <br />mg /L). <br />3.0 Implication for Water Quality <br />A positive Acid -Base Potential indicates potentially acid - neutralizing material (Skousen et. al., <br />2002). Based on the results of the Acid -Base Accounting, a near neutral to alkaline solution with <br />sufficient carbonate to neutralize any acid produced during weathering. <br />Arsenic was the only metal greater than a Basic Standard. This metal was only slightly above <br />the Human Health Standard Domestic Water Supply. The analytical results were based on <br />leaching with a weak acid. Given that surface water draining from the catchment is near neutral <br />to alkaline (R2 Incorporated, 2010), any water coming in contact with the mine rock is predicted <br />to have less of a leaching effect, and a lower arsenic value. <br />References <br />R2 Incorporated (2010) Surface water analysis in the vicinity of the Idaho and Mayday Mine <br />Permit Areas. Letter report prepared for Wildcat Mining Corporation dated May 28, 2010. <br />Skousen, J., Simmons, J., McDonald, L.M. and Ziemkiewicz, P. (2002) Acid - base accounting to <br />predict post mining drainage quality on surface mines. Journal of Environmental Quality, 31, <br />2034 -2044. <br />Sobek, A.A., Schuller, W.A., Freeman, J.R. and Smith J.M. (1978) Field and laboratory methods <br />applicable to overburden and minesoils. USEPA Report EPA - 600/2 - 78 - 054. <br />USEPA (2007) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical /Chemical Methods. <br />Revision 6. http: / /www.epa.gov/ wastes / hazard /testmethods /sw846 /online /index.htm <br />Wildcat Mining Corporation <br />May Day Idaho Mine Complex — 112d Permit Application <br />Revised August 2011 <br />Exhibit U — Attachment U -6 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.