My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-07-20_REPORT - M1980244
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2011-07-20_REPORT - M1980244
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:52:30 PM
Creation date
7/21/2011 12:50:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
7/20/2011
Doc Name
Weekly Construction Quality Assurance ("CQA") Reports: Weeks of 6/26/2011 and 7/03/2011.
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM9
Email Name
BMK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ame0 <br />IV)VLF Geosynthetics <br />A) Geomembrane Installation <br />1) VLF <br />Geomembrane installation within the Phase 5 VLF resumed performing deployment, seaming, <br />and repair /QC activities. Geomembrane installation was performed in the area shown in Figure <br />3. Approximately 182,285 square feet of 80mil LLDPE was deployed using a John Deere 200 <br />excavator and a John Deere 544 front -end loader with spreader -bar attachments. Subgrade was <br />inspected and approved by AMEC and Lonestar representatives prior to geomembrane <br />deployment (see Figure 3). Approximately 8,720 linear feet of seam was fusion welded using <br />four fusion welding machine. Twenty -two destructive test samples were marked during fusion <br />seaming. All destructive tests performed were within project specifications. Non - destructive <br />testing was performed for fusion welded seams. Repairs were performed using the extrusion <br />welding method for all marked defects. Vacuum testing was performed for all extrusion <br />welded seams and repairs. <br />During the Cresson blasts, an AMEC field representative observed the geomembrane and no <br />damage was found. <br />B) Geomembrane Exposure <br />1) VLF <br />Exposure of previously installed geomembrane near station H32 +00 ( + / -) was performed using <br />a John Deere 35D excavator and laborers. An AMEC field representative observed the <br />geomembrane exposure constantly. <br />C) Anchor Trench <br />1) VLF <br />Temporary anchor trench excavation continued between stations J3 +00 ( + / -) and J7 +50 ( + / -) using <br />a John Deere 35D excavator and one laborer. The anchor trench was inspected by an AMEC field <br />representative and found to be constructed in accordance with design drawings and project <br />specifications. <br />Anchor trench backfill was performed between stations J3 +00 ( + / -) and J7 +00 ( + / -) using a skid <br />steer loader and laborers. An AMEC representative observed and inspected the anchor trench <br />backfill. The trench was found to be backfilled in accordance with design drawings and project <br />specifications. <br />D) Geomembrane Acceptance <br />1) VLF <br />No geomembrane was accepted during the week. Previous geomembrane acceptance <br />performed is shown on Figure 4. <br />VLF Weekly Report WE 07.02.2011 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.