My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-08-19_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
1988-08-19_PERMIT FILE - C1981008A (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2021 7:15:30 PM
Creation date
7/11/2011 9:39:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008A
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
8/19/1988
Doc Name
Soil Baseline Study Nucla East Study Area
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 9 Attachment 9-5
Email Name
MLT
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Scientist Mr. Jim Hyenhuis resulted ,n the following agreement concerning selected <br /> scope-of-work items: <br /> O An Order 1-2 level soil survey should be done for this project. <br /> 0 Soil samples should be taken from individual soil profiles rather than being <br /> composited over several sample locations. <br /> \� o Soil samples should be taken from all soil profile subhorizons. <br /> / *�N o All soil samples with PH values less than 6.5 should be analyzed for acid-base <br /> potential. <br /> o Laboratory analysts for soil fertility parameters (nitrogen, ammonium plus <br /> nitrate, phosphorus, and potassium) should not be done during the soil baseline <br /> study. The prime farmland soils are to be sampled for soil fertility within one <br /> year prior to disturbance. Fertility analyses are also to be completed within <br /> reclamation areas once the topsoil has been redistributed. <br /> o Selenium should be analyzed if indicator plants are present, and a threshold <br /> level of 2 ppm or less should be used for soil suitability evaluation. <br /> • All soil taxonomic units appearing in the soil survey legend were described and <br /> characterized. The number of samples per taxonomic unit adequately characterized each map <br /> unit, and foll mod or exceeded sample intensities recommended by PCC and CMLRD. <br /> Samples were collected in the field and analyzed in the laboratory in accordance with <br /> CMLRD-approved procedures for topsoil analyses as outlined in Table 9-5-1. The <br /> information presented in Table 9-5-1 is a synthesis of material from the approved <br /> scope-of-work and InterMountain Laboratories (IML's) standard procedures for topsoil <br /> analysis. Sample site locations were selected to most accurately represent the sampled <br /> soil series and to provide for adequate sample site distribution across the projected <br /> disturbance areas. Transition zones between map units, road edges, fence rows, or <br /> previously disturbed areas were avoided. Representative profiles were selected on the <br /> basis of medial characteristics for physical and chemical soil characteristics, parent <br /> material, landscape position, and vegetation. The major soil horizons (A, E, B, and C) <br /> were separately described, sampled, and analyzed. Portions of paralithic material (Cr), <br /> if present, were also described, sampled, and analyzed for characterization purposes and <br /> Possible subsequent use as a topsoil substitute if needed. <br /> • Surface and subsoil horizons (A and B horizons) were sampled to represent no greater than <br /> 9-5-12 Revised 04/11/88 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.