My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-06-21_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010088
>
2011-06-21_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:34:43 PM
Creation date
6/22/2011 9:31:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010088
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
6/21/2011
Doc Name
Adequacy Review No. 2
From
DRMS
To
CAM Colordo, LLC
Email Name
MPB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Corey Heaps <br />CAM Colorado LLC <br />June 21, 2011 Page 55 <br />refinery. Please include a copy of these photographs in the report as evidence to <br />further describe the land use prior to the establishment of the refinery. <br />112. Response accepted. <br />Rule 2.10 Maps and Plans <br />113. On Map 10, the Permit Boundary is not shown. Please add the Permit Boundary. <br />CAM Response: Please see revised Map -10 <br />Division Response: Response accepted. <br />114. The typical section for Haul Road #1 shown on Map 15 does not portray the proposed <br />surfacing materials and thicknesses as does the Haul Road #2 section. Please revise the <br />graphic to include materials and thicknesses proposed to surface Haul Road #1. <br />CAM Response: Please see revised Map -15 <br />Division Response: Map 15 was revised to show Haul Road #1 being constructed of Pit <br />Run gravel topped by 6" of 1 -112" Road Base. The Pit Run is shown as variable. <br />Certain additional details were incorporated with the Apr -2011 response, but a <br />number of questions remain regarding design and construction of the haul roads. <br />These questions are itemized under section 2.05.3(3) in this adequacy review. <br />115. Map 21 provides two sections (A -A' and B -B') for the rail spur. Please revise Map 21 to <br />include a typical section which shows the types of materials and thicknesses thereof <br />proposed for construction of the rail spur embankment. <br />CAM Response: In lieu of typical section shown on Map 21, please see the Union <br />Pacific typical section as shown in Exhibit 16. <br />Division Response: Response accepted. <br />116. Map 21 illustrates the profile of the proposed rail spur and loop. The location of the <br />proposed bridge spanning Reed Wash is not shown. Please add this feature to the rail <br />spur profile. <br />CAM Response: Please see revised Map -21. <br />Division Response: Reed Wash is identified on the Rail Spur profile on Map 21, but the <br />bridge is not depicted. Please incorporate a general representation of the bridge onto <br />the rail spur profile. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.