My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-06-21_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010088
>
2011-06-21_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010088
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:34:43 PM
Creation date
6/22/2011 9:31:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010088
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
6/21/2011
Doc Name
Adequacy Review No. 2
From
DRMS
To
CAM Colordo, LLC
Email Name
MPB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Corey Heaps <br />CAM CoIorado LLC <br />June 21, 2011 Pag I I <br />Division Response: The Division has no further concerns at this time. In the submittal <br />dated April 11, 2011, CAM updated the water monitoring data in Appendix 3 to include <br />monitoring results for all four quarters of 2010. Since the Lower Downstream Loma <br />Drain surface water station was recently added, only one quarter of data has been <br />provided. Additional baseline sampling results will need to be submitted for this <br />station. <br />14. Under Rule 2.04.7(2)(a) on permit text page 2.04 -18, please expand on the discussion of <br />the Colorado River, including how the river might affect or be affected by the loadout <br />disturbances. <br />CAM Response: Please see revised pages 2.04 -18, 19 and 20. <br />Division Response: Response accepted. <br />15. Under Rule 2.04.7(2)(b), please add the flow data to surface water monitoring station DS- <br />CR in Exhibit 3 of Volume I. <br />CAM Response: Flow data has been added to DS -CR in Exhibit 3 for all four quarters. <br />Division Response: Response accepted. <br />15a. On page 2.05 -59 of the April 11, 2011 submittal, the first sentence states that the <br />Colorado River will not be monitored. Please correct this statement since the river is <br />part of the water monitoring program. <br />16. Due to its proximity to the Colorado River, please describe in Section 2.04.7 what the <br />historical record is for flooding or having an elevated ground water table in the permit <br />area. <br />CAM Response: As stated in section 2.04.7, "it is unlikely that the ground water beneath <br />the proposed loadout facility is directly related to the Colorado River "; it is not likely that <br />flooding of the River will substantially raise the level of the groundwater. The <br />groundwater elevation is more likely to be affected by upland irrigation users, or a large <br />precipitation event. In addition, the mapped FEMA floodplain elevation is over 800 feet <br />south of the permit boundary as discussed on page 2.04 -18. Historic Colorado River <br />flooding information is added to 2.04.7(2)(i), page 2.04 -19. <br />Division Response: Response accepted. <br />17. In Section 2.04.7(4)(b) of page 2.04 -26, it is stated that the current surface water users are <br />the landowners who irrigate the land west of Loma Drain and north of State Highway 6 & <br />50. However, there does not appear to be a map that shows who these landowners are. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.